I used the search engine, could not find anything to match my question.
So, I'm going to be sitting down and scripting certain effects, working on originality in both patter and presentation, just to come up with a solid foundation to work with, when I perform.
Enough of that, now comes the question:
In your own opinion, when do you feel a piece of magic needs no patter, so to speak, and to just let the effect speak for itself, so to speak?
I'm not putting down performance and story telling, you can do both without speaking, ask Charlie Chaplin. What I'm trying to say is, sometimes I feel it is unnecessary to verbalize what you are trying to say, to get the best reaction out of certain works. A specific sort of effect I'm talking about, but I won't drop hints, so as to not influence opinions.
The effect should have to speak for itself, of course, you're the manipulator afterall.
In summary, where do you draw the line in your verbalization?
So, I'm going to be sitting down and scripting certain effects, working on originality in both patter and presentation, just to come up with a solid foundation to work with, when I perform.
Enough of that, now comes the question:
In your own opinion, when do you feel a piece of magic needs no patter, so to speak, and to just let the effect speak for itself, so to speak?
I'm not putting down performance and story telling, you can do both without speaking, ask Charlie Chaplin. What I'm trying to say is, sometimes I feel it is unnecessary to verbalize what you are trying to say, to get the best reaction out of certain works. A specific sort of effect I'm talking about, but I won't drop hints, so as to not influence opinions.
The effect should have to speak for itself, of course, you're the manipulator afterall.
In summary, where do you draw the line in your verbalization?