Daniel Madison's Statistical abilities

Oct 13, 2008
167
0
I was noticing the Cooking Dice entry on his blog

http://danielmadison.co.uk/Blog02.html (just go all the way down to the very bottom)

Now, one part caught my attention; it describes the results he made.

Although with this die the chances of landing a 1 are increased, I rolled the die 50 times and only landed 1 - 18 times; which although at 36% is statistically above average (16.6%) I'd be more incline to put that down to the laws of chance than the implementation of a crooked die; to which I see no advantage of taking the risk involved with playing with such an instrument of deception.

As a statistics graduate student, and especially given the fact that I JUST got out of a Nonparametric Procedures midterm, I decided to put that statement to the test. So the setting is this:

Null Hypothesis: p = 1/6 or about 0.16666...
Alternative Hypothesis: p > 1/6
Sample size: 50
Parameter (# of successes): 18

Now the easiest way to take care of this is to find the p-value. In non-stats terms, it's the odds that he'd get 18 or more successes (as in, the face with one pip showing on top). So I went here, since there's no way the tables in my textbook would work:

http://stattrek.com/tables/binomial.aspx

Turns out, P(X >= 18) is equal to 0.00077. That is, the chances that he'd get at least 18 out of 50 rolls such that the desired face (one) shows up is below 0.08%

He should have more confidence in his work; in any case, I'm glad he did the microwave experiments, even though I lost one of my casino dice to trying the same. Oh well, always hope for the future!

If you don't understand, feel free to ask in your reply; I did the stats so you don't have to ;-)

-Sean
 
Nov 27, 2009
456
3
Stats rocks! nice analysis. I'm not quite as advanced as you are, having only taken the basic college course, but I got what you were saying.
 
Oct 13, 2008
167
0
Stats rocks! nice analysis. I'm not quite as advanced as you are, having only taken the basic college course, but I got what you were saying.

Ah good! Some intelligent discussion, like I was hoping for. I'm glad you got the point, even though I did try to make it a bit clearer because most I've seen here are statistics laypeople (as in, not this advanced)
 
Jul 14, 2010
37
0
why don't you write him an email about it?

i m not advanced in statistics either,but I could follow this,and it seems like you have a point.
 
Oct 13, 2008
167
0
why don't you write him an email about it?

i m not advanced in statistics either,but I could follow this,and it seems like you have a point.

I don't know Master Madison's email ヽ( ゚ヮ・)ノ (derp)

In any case, he'd probably ignore it anyways
 
Searching...
{[{ searchResultsCount }]} Results