Ah fair enoughThere's nothing wrong with double cross. I just don't like it.
I love double cross but I love your argument against it more. Nothing wrong with it, just not for you!There's nothing wrong with double cross. I just don't like it.
Honestly? Most of the market. There's a ton of junk out there.
Though your title is a bit off. Effects and tricks are not the same thing, no matter how hard some magicians try to make it that way.
To be more specific - I would be happy to see sucker tricks disappear completely. And anything else that simply serves to stroke the magician's ego.
Considering that I often find R Paul Wilson to be overly egotistical as a magician
The thing I will always remember about Wilson is when he was acting as Lenart's "assistant" in the Green Magic videos. How he tried to look completely unimpressed the entire time. Maybe its just a Scottish thing.
I've seen performances where they act like they're going to use the spectators hand, build it up, and then don't. I thought that was pretty funny but I agree otherwise.The trick(s) that involve the magician slamming his hands onto nails or spikes, but only when it involves an audience member. I've seen the trick done where it's just the magician who does it, and for a lot of the presentations I've enjoyed it. But I hate it with a burning passion when they involve someone else's hand. I'm all for including spectators into my tricks but not when there's this element of physical harm (even though we know there is no danger).