So I have heard multiple magicians talk about Rubik's cube magic, downgrading it as if it isn't a real form of magic, and I can;t understand why. Their reasoning is that "Oh well, the effect is the method." or for the effects that do something different "The effect is made to look plausible.". How does mean that Rubik's cube magic (RCM as I will refer to it from here on out) isn't magic? I strongly disagree.
Here's my argument against this:
Point A: Sword Swallowing
Sword Swallowing is not generally presented as your "normal magic", but it is a form of magic that falls under the same category. I've always heard people say "oh it must be a candy sword", or "its a drop out sword" though that isn't the case. Aren't those the same types of plausible scenarios presented with RCM? And in both scenarios, isn't the method the effect at its core? If you are looking at it like that, isn't sword swallowing, and a ton of other major effects in the same category?
Point B: Non Geek Circus/Sideshow Magic
Similarly to sword swallowing, these effects are 100% real. Fire Eating, Eating a Light bulb, hammering a nail into your nose, putting a ice pick through your hand and arm (cough cough David Blaine cough cough), etc. All of these actually happen. Thus, the effect is the method, but it is still magic.
Point C: It fits the reason.
The point of Magic is to connect with the audience, entertain, and bring a unique sense of wonder, right? Rubik's cube magic has entertained a huge amount of people, due to its large following, allows you to connect with the audience because everyone can relate to it and it creates nice patter, and it brings a great wonder to the table. I was watching Steven Brundage's Work, specifically Cube 3, and even though I knew the basics of what was going on, my mind was blown as to how one can perform such a feat so cleanly and so effortlessly.
So I cannot see how anyone would say rubik's cube magic is not actually magic.
Thoughts?
Here's my argument against this:
Point A: Sword Swallowing
Sword Swallowing is not generally presented as your "normal magic", but it is a form of magic that falls under the same category. I've always heard people say "oh it must be a candy sword", or "its a drop out sword" though that isn't the case. Aren't those the same types of plausible scenarios presented with RCM? And in both scenarios, isn't the method the effect at its core? If you are looking at it like that, isn't sword swallowing, and a ton of other major effects in the same category?
Point B: Non Geek Circus/Sideshow Magic
Similarly to sword swallowing, these effects are 100% real. Fire Eating, Eating a Light bulb, hammering a nail into your nose, putting a ice pick through your hand and arm (cough cough David Blaine cough cough), etc. All of these actually happen. Thus, the effect is the method, but it is still magic.
Point C: It fits the reason.
The point of Magic is to connect with the audience, entertain, and bring a unique sense of wonder, right? Rubik's cube magic has entertained a huge amount of people, due to its large following, allows you to connect with the audience because everyone can relate to it and it creates nice patter, and it brings a great wonder to the table. I was watching Steven Brundage's Work, specifically Cube 3, and even though I knew the basics of what was going on, my mind was blown as to how one can perform such a feat so cleanly and so effortlessly.
So I cannot see how anyone would say rubik's cube magic is not actually magic.
Thoughts?