well, at first i was psyched when i found out d&d put an explanation of the jones change on the trilogy, but after watching it, i was like wtf? i mean i'm pretty sure that this was discussed ALOT in the d&d forum, but since i never was active there, could someone please clear this up for me: it seems to me like the jones change explanation on the trilogy is just wrong. i've watched it over and over and over, and before i started writing this topic i watched it again like 10 times, but when they actually explain the change, the card just doesn't change. did they really make that mistake? i mean i got the idea, but not the exact handling, what do you say?