yeah you should be glad of that, but all that really means is that you aren't doing much research. so your move is a weave of the deck, then a combination bridge and spring? i've hella worked on that lots. i think lots of people have, because when you try to do a bridge longitudinally, more often than not it springs some of the cards out when you DON'T want it to, LOL
this is why n00bs think they invent a lot of moves, because several moves have common mistakes that are easily and often made, and when you make certain mistakes, there are common results that happen (like an accidental spring, or a "card shoot", etc etc)... i can't tell you how many n00bs think they have invented a variation on the TG deck flip where they "keep one card but the rest of the deck is reversed!!!"
also it was still kind of hard to tell from your video what was going on... fyi the first 40 seconds of your 1 minute video were completely superfluous to your "spring", seriously that could have been a 20 second long video and still got the same idea across.
along the same lines of your thinking, I've found a better idea to keep it cleaner is to do the same thing but rotated so the cards are facing directly away from you, then do a waterfall (rather than a spring) down into your other hand as you bridge the cards together. it is difficult or impossible to do a clean spring right out of a bridge, because the cards won't be evenly lined up, which is detrimental to having a 'smooth controlled release' which is the keystone of excellent springing.
or you could master this, and prove me wrong, which would be really awesome.