I think that most of them have been covered. Vanishes of coins, sponge balls, cups & balls, billiard balls and card vanishes rely on the retention of vision. In cups & balls, there are some more advanced vanishes that rely a similar principle to be convincing - the continuation of motion. That is, the ball is seen in motion between points A, B and C and then appears at point F and the brain assumes that to get there it traveled through points D and E. Essentially, both retention and continuation of motion are applications of Newton's Law of Inertia because the spectator does not see the external force acting upon the object. Or, put simply a selection of reality is a distortion of reality (see signature).
So, if you expand the retention of vision concept into the memory of presented events augmented by the expected intermediate steps or logical outcomes, you have many principles of parlor or stage magic. For example, if I put a chicken into a box, the expectation is that it remains in the box until you see it taken out. If I put an egg into a bag, the expectation is that it remains there until it is taken out. In essence, it is retention of memory. The magic works because previous, concurrent or subsequent actions are not remembered and therefore the force required to alter the Law of Magical Inertia is not remembered.
So I come full circle to argue that retention of vision is merely one form of retention of memory.