Insane Mentalism Routine - Clarity Box

Pete Pridanonda

Elite Member
Jun 13, 2009
402
35
I usually don't do a lot of mentalism but I've recently put together a mentalism routine that has a very impossible ending. I've been performing this routine LIVE for the past week with great reactions. Would love to hear all of your thoughts since I'm planning on using this routine as a closer in my close up and parlour shows in the future. A big thank you to David Regal for inventing the clarity box!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0RtmNsEfio
 
Apr 17, 2013
885
4
One side thing I would look at. It is what I did when i was playing around with the box, before I went back to Boxer from Adam Wilber. I'll dump what is in the box then do the load and drop the other item like a coin or match book. So when you dump the paper out of the box the other item falls out as well. It adds a little layer to the effect that what is in the box is really coming out of the box.
 
Dec 18, 2007
1,610
14
64
Northampton, MA - USA
Since you admit to being a magician I'll not be too hard on you but I must point out that this is NOT "mentalism" but rather, Mental Magic. . . that's not so much a bad thing, it's just the realization as to what you are doing. Had a "Mentalist" done a similar routine, even using your patter/script the handling would have been very different and chances are very strong that no playing cards would be used but rather something more like post cards, photos or even business cards. . . we always substitute where we can in that cards are associated with two different niches that suggest "chicanery" -- Magic & Gambling. As a Mentalist one seeks to distance themselves from such associations (I know one particular act that actually asks people to not mention them on magic forums though they've won several major competitions within the magic world).

It's a cute Confabulation styled routine but very commercial. Once you are comfortable with the handling start working on making it cleaner in style and operation. . . be willing to let go of the "gimmicks & devices" and you'll be well on your way to accomplishing two things; making the effect your own. . . something that is associated with you that no one else does. Too, you will be far closer to doing actual Mentalism. Trust me, you can use two simple techniques found in Corinda that will improve this routine 100 fold.

One last note. . . if you decide you want to pursue Mentalism then you will need to ween yourself from the magic tricks when it comes to public presentation; Magic & Mentalism are psychological opposites in how they are presented and what the goals are. Mentalism elicits belief while Magic has you suspend belief and open your imagination; Mentalism is deliberately presented (most of the time) as being a genuine thing -- not so much Psychic, though that is a path taken by some, but as proof to things like NLP, the power of words, Mega Mind/Memory demonstrations and more.
 
It's nice, and I like it, however get rid of the playing card chosen. You don't reveal it so it seems pointless. Possibly going along with what Craig said, have postcards or business cards with places on them where you can go on holiday, Or a blank deck with it written on so that you can still do the name bit.

Simon_Magic
 

Pete Pridanonda

Elite Member
Jun 13, 2009
402
35
One side thing I would look at. It is what I did when i was playing around with the box, before I went back to Boxer from Adam Wilber. I'll dump what is in the box then do the load and drop the other item like a coin or match book. So when you dump the paper out of the box the other item falls out as well. It adds a little layer to the effect that what is in the box is really coming out of the box.

That is a great idea! I will definitely keep that in mind next time!
 

WitchDocIsIn

Elite Member
Sep 13, 2008
5,879
2,945
Can I just ask one question? (Well, two, technically. Pedants.)

What, exactly, is 'insane' about this routine?
 

Pete Pridanonda

Elite Member
Jun 13, 2009
402
35
Since you admit to being a magician I'll not be too hard on you but I must point out that this is NOT "mentalism" but rather, Mental Magic. . . that's not so much a bad thing, it's just the realization as to what you are doing. Had a "Mentalist" done a similar routine, even using your patter/script the handling would have been very different and chances are very strong that no playing cards would be used but rather something more like post cards, photos or even business cards. . . we always substitute where we can in that cards are associated with two different niches that suggest "chicanery" -- Magic & Gambling. As a Mentalist one seeks to distance themselves from such associations (I know one particular act that actually asks people to not mention them on magic forums though they've won several major competitions within the magic world).

It's a cute Confabulation styled routine but very commercial. Once you are comfortable with the handling start working on making it cleaner in style and operation. . . be willing to let go of the "gimmicks & devices" and you'll be well on your way to accomplishing two things; making the effect your own. . . something that is associated with you that no one else does. Too, you will be far closer to doing actual Mentalism. Trust me, you can use two simple techniques found in Corinda that will improve this routine 100 fold.

One last note. . . if you decide you want to pursue Mentalism then you will need to ween yourself from the magic tricks when it comes to public presentation; Magic & Mentalism are psychological opposites in how they are presented and what the goals are. Mentalism elicits belief while Magic has you suspend belief and open your imagination; Mentalism is deliberately presented (most of the time) as being a genuine thing -- not so much Psychic, though that is a path taken by some, but as proof to things like NLP, the power of words, Mega Mind/Memory demonstrations and more.

Thank you Craig for your careful observation and for your explanation and analysis. There are many performers who classified themselves as "Magician and Mentalist" so for that reason, do you think there are any performers out there who can convince their audience to belief in mentalism even though there are also a mix of magic effects in their act? When my friends saw Derren Brown performed on tv, they ask me if I know how he did his "tricks". Even though he is a mentalist, it would still be very difficult to convince his audience what he did was real, and the same applies to magic. Just my thoughts.
 

WitchDocIsIn

Elite Member
Sep 13, 2008
5,879
2,945
The fact that the prediction has been in full view the entire time and also matches what the audience said is very insane to laymen.

Ok. But if you want to keep a prediction in front of someone the whole time, why not give it to them? Why do you need a box, a deck, a notebook, a pen, and pad of post its?

I'm not trying to slam on you. It's great how much you perform and push yourself out there to get better. But every time you bring out something new, it takes it further and further from miracles and closer and closer to tricks.

"Every prop you introduce lowers your value" (Paraphrased)
 
Dec 18, 2007
1,610
14
64
Northampton, MA - USA
Thank you Craig for your careful observation and for your explanation and analysis. There are many performers who classified themselves as "Magician and Mentalist" so for that reason, do you think there are any performers out there who can convince their audience to belief in mentalism even though there are also a mix of magic effects in their act? When my friends saw Derren Brown performed on tv, they ask me if I know how he did his "tricks". Even though he is a mentalist, it would still be very difficult to convince his audience what he did was real, and the same applies to magic. Just my thoughts.

Understand, there are people that believe Copperfield really flies too. . . one lady I knew claimed it was David's use of the Kabala, give that David is Jewish by birth.

While presentation is everything you have to look at context and how MOST that mix magic with mentalism hurt the the latter. Brown, while I'm not overly thrilled by him, is a decent showman and a hint charismatic. He presents much of the mentalism he does as psychologically based "experiments" and because of this, he can get away with the mixing or "blending" as it were. Your claim does have a lot more to do with things and if you're a cynic, such as Brown tends to be, then meshing Magic with Mentalism is status quo . . . the agenda is to neuter Mentalism and those Mentalists that proudly call themselves Psychic Entertainers and not just Mind Readers (though many of them do the work "for real" as well).

The argument about people like Brown, Banachek and even Osterlind doing magic & mentalism is old. . . even Dunninger did big illusions in some of his shows. the common factor with all of them is what I've already stated; they are all skeptics and while they will seek to do the best possible demonstration they can, they are still looking at what they do as a trick and that in itself creates harm to the art. I probably should point out that Larry Becker & Lee Earle both admit that they do Mental Magic more than pure Mentalism because of how they blend the two skill sets and how Larry in particular, does almost everything with a deck of cards (a big Taboo for most Mentalists, believe it or not).

Fact is, to be successful commercially you must include a bit of Mental Magic because it adds production value and helps lend to the public, an "out" -- they see something that looks more like a trick or something that's "familiar" and it helps them to relax. Another odd fact is that I have personally developed big illusions that were specifically designed to work in a Mentalism program. . . if you were to have access to the now dead On-Line Visions eZine (one of the oldest and largest publications for years) you would find articles where I discuss this and how such steps help the Mental performer explain other principles allied with Metaphysical thinking such as Astral Projection, seeing the Aura and so forth. The thing is, we have framed such pieces by way of the presentation; the Aura routine is more of a "what if we could" type bit while the Astral Projection routine would remind you more of a Spirit Cabinet act, even though it goes a bit beyond that and avoids some of the usual gags.

Since the inception of Mentalism there has been an obvious relationship with Magic but they are not the same thing and in order to gain the strongest possible advantage, separation from magic is always best, this has been proven historically more than a few hundred times vs. the handful of successful acts that run contrary to this claim. The biggest thing that "justifies" this mix in recent years, has been the TV exposure to people like Brown, Angel and even Blaine rather than people actually learning the art from the working pros; Commercialism always fixes itself into the consumer mind-set, it's that simple.

HOWEVER. . . there is an underground movement known generally as Urban-Shamanism that you can read threads about here and at E both. This genre does successfully blend the two art forms along with puppets and storytelling but it's done as if the magic were real. . . just as real as the mentalism and then some. The effects are carefully chosen so as to meet certain very specific criteria and the performer's attitude and actions are 99% of the whole ordeal -- they are literally their persona 24/7. . . a Shaman in modern environs -- a "holy man" if you would.
 

Pete Pridanonda

Elite Member
Jun 13, 2009
402
35
Ok. But if you want to keep a prediction in front of someone the whole time, why not give it to them? Why do you need a box, a deck, a notebook, a pen, and pad of post its?

I'm not trying to slam on you. It's great how much you perform and push yourself out there to get better. But every time you bring out something new, it takes it further and further from miracles and closer and closer to tricks.

"Every prop you introduce lowers your value" (Paraphrased)

Thank you very much for your honest feedback Christopher. The reason why I don't let the spectator hold the prediction is because some people might think that he or she is my assistant who writes down all the information while everyone is looking away. By having the prediction in full view, everyone can confirmed that no one ever gets near the box.
I do agree with you though, less props would be a better approach in order to make the performance as real as possible. I will keep that in mind!
 

WitchDocIsIn

Elite Member
Sep 13, 2008
5,879
2,945
Thank you very much for your honest feedback Christopher. The reason why I don't let the spectator hold the prediction is because some people might think that he or she is my assistant who writes down all the information while everyone is looking away. By having the prediction in full view, everyone can confirmed that no one ever gets near the box.
I do agree with you though, less props would be a better approach in order to make the performance as real as possible. I will keep that in mind!

You're thinking like a magician. Disproving things before anyone's even thought of them, most likely. Magicians try to make everything bullet proof and more impossible, and in doing so make it boring and predictable.

Hand the prediction or whatever to a spectator, ask the to hold it at arm's length so you can't get to it. This is organic and natural to do. Nothing about a clear box is organic or natural, it screams set up.
 
Searching...
{[{ searchResultsCount }]} Results