Guardians and Wynns vs. Masters

[Spock]

This has probably been asked before, but I was wondering how the Guardians and the Wynns compare to E's Masters deck. My current Masters has lasted me three weeks of semi-intense use, and is just about to be retired. I am curious since E claims that the Masters is the best deck in the world, which is suspicious marketing in itself, but people seem to dislike the deck itself, even though for me it outlasted regular 808s by two weeks. Anyway, just want to know people's opinions on Wynns and Guardians before I splurge.

 

[Guardian18]

If you're talkin' 'bout Brown Wynns, they are good, after you break 'em in. Which doesn't take long. But after a week of playing with them, they started to clump a little. Guardians are good. Last long. The masters did not last for me AT ALL. I don't know why. Maybe I had a weird deck. Or maybe they just suck in general.

 

[Eddie]

Browns are decent, nothing special. I only use them for magic as they feel awful when I try to flourish with them. I don't have any Guardians.

I have used a couple of masters, and I would rather go for the Brown Wynns more since I like the back design(not as much as the color though...)
But feel-wise, they are pretty close... and Masters are not the greatest cards in the world. It is an opinion statement.

 

[cenafreak0709]

I'd use wynns for flourishing, masters for magic, and guardians for both and to play with.