Neuro-Linguistic Programming?

[ThrallMind]

I have to respectfully disagree with this.

Yes, it's true that most people's view of hypnosis is that of the traditional stage hypnotist. A hypnotist performing an induction, subjects "going out", subjects doing silly things, etc, etc, etc...

Hypnosis, however, is actually vastly different. It can very easily be integrated into what you already do, and the results are outstanding.

Got questions? Feel free to ask.

Which is exactly what I said. The underlying principles of hypnosis are great for anything. Formally hypnotizing someone after you did a card trick...that just doesn't flow well.

Welcome to the forums! I hope you enjoy your stay here.

-ThrallMind

 

[BillGladwell]

Which is exactly what I said. The underlying principles of hypnosis are great for anything. Formally hypnotizing someone after you did a card trick...that just doesn't flow well.

Welcome to the forums! I hope you enjoy your stay here.

-ThrallMind

Hmm... I believe the thread got tangled up in my mind as I typed my previous post... That is exactly what you said, ThrallMind.

Next time, I'll read more carefully.

Yes, I agree. I separate an overt hypnosis performance from an overt magic performance. Both, however, are components of the other.

Hypnosis (and NLP) strengthen magic and any performance greatly.