well, at first i was psyched when i found out d&d put an explanation of the jones change on the trilogy, but after watching it, i was like wtf? i mean i'm pretty sure that this was discussed ALOT in the d&d forum, but since i never was active there, could someone please clear this up for me:
it seems to me like the jones change explanation on the trilogy is just wrong. i've watched it over and over and over, and before i started writing this topic i watched it again like 10 times, but when they actually explain the change, the card just doesn't change. did they really make that mistake? i mean i got the idea, but not the exact handling, what do you say?
it seems to me like the jones change explanation on the trilogy is just wrong. i've watched it over and over and over, and before i started writing this topic i watched it again like 10 times, but when they actually explain the change, the card just doesn't change. did they really make that mistake? i mean i got the idea, but not the exact handling, what do you say?