theory11 — Magic Tricks & the World's Finest Playing Cards
First off, many people may not know the answer. Second, it's only been four hours since your first post... that isn't a very long time. Third, you are 16 and really shouldn't be attempting the needle swallowing.
Mate, that's really patronising. What does triixOr's age have to do with whether or not he or she "should" attempt needle swallowing (as with any other trick, really)? Would you have warned a 16 year old against attempting to do the ambitious card trick? So why do it when needles are involved?
***
So. Why's needle swallowing more dangerous than the ambitious card routine?
Because of the physical dangers involved with sharp objects.
Dangers made manageable by proper preparation and correct performance of the trick.
Going by what you've said, you're saying either
a) "Based on the risk of physical danger present in the needle swallowing trick, no one, regardless of their age, should perform it,"
or
b) "No one under 16 years of age should perform the needle swallowing trick because, being only 16 years old, they are incapable of proper preparation and performance of the trick, and it will only lead them to physical harm."
And you know what?
You could be right. triixOr could be completely unprepared for such a trick. Most 16 year olds could be unfit for performing this trick. But hell, so could a 40 year old just as easily, neh, old man?
But that's not for you to decide. It's for the companies selling the trick (with them, it's actually a legal concern if they market tricks that end up with people in the hospital), and for the individual performer.
Your ****ing patronising bull**** is bull****, asshat.
It is a pleasure to meet you too. In the future, please try to express yourself without the stared out profanity.
Swallowing needles shouldn't be performed by a 16 year old who has been doing magic for two years (go back and read triixOr's other posts) for the following reasons:
1) It is dangerous even with the necessary preparation and training
2) Most spectators would not be interested in seeing a child (and yes 16 is a child) performing that type of effect
3) The effect relies on very strong presentation skills which most 16 year olds would lack.