theory11 — Magic Tricks & the World's Finest Playing Cards
Lee Asher's Witness vs Wayne Houchin's Indecent
- Thread starter gasponte
- Start date
Well like everybody has said, presentation. They both have pros and cons.
Witness
Pro: Less risk of card not being in the bag
Con: You tell the spectator what you are going to do. (Of course, that is a presentation thing)
Indecent
Pro: Signed card appears in examible bag.
Con: Small chance that card maynot appear in bag.
Obviously there are more. It all just depends on your stlye, presentation and what you like.
Cheers, Tom
Witness
Pro: Less risk of card not being in the bag
Con: You tell the spectator what you are going to do. (Of course, that is a presentation thing)
Indecent
Pro: Signed card appears in examible bag.
Con: Small chance that card maynot appear in bag.
Obviously there are more. It all just depends on your stlye, presentation and what you like.
Cheers, Tom
Last edited by a moderator:
Not unless your doing Indecent 2.0 where a card sealed inside a zip lock back appears in side another sealed ziplock bag :O
Cheers, Tom
i actually dont like witnessed. the whole plot of a card changing in a bag doesnt mystify me. Id rather do it without the bag. and thats how i perform it (without the bag). On the other hand i love indecent. i do it all the time. and its just slightly more impromptu then witnessed. Indecent is one of the tricks in my repoitoire i do all the time. (so is anything else wayne does..lol)
this might be a stupid question but doesn't incedent cost you 5 bucks each time you do it...ie. for replacement gimmicked bags or is there a way of making them yourself
Specs point of view- Witness because it happens in their hands
Performer's-Indecent because it's almost imprompytu with a tiny little setup
But what's more important is the spec's point of view so.....
Performer's-Indecent because it's almost imprompytu with a tiny little setup
But what's more important is the spec's point of view so.....