theory11 — Magic Tricks & the World's Finest Playing Cards
4) triumph(im not sure if thats a good closer though)
I personally do Guy Hollighworths Triumph when without a table. It's basically Dai Vernon's handling but without a table. Triumph can be a very strong closer, when presented properly.
do you not likes sloppy shuffle or what?. because to me, it wouldnt matter how the magician shuffles the deck.
People will get bored if YOU bore them, not the tricks. Some magicians can't entertain with one trick, so two is pushing it for them.
If people are getting bored with your magic, then you should focus on what you're doing (or not doing) to elicit that reaction.
1) Here then there or 2 card monte
2) Biddle Trick or Quick as a wink
3) ACR- 3 phases
4) triumph(im not sure if thats a good closer though)
Here's my comments on these 4, which you posted.
1) You have 4 "pick-a-card" tricks in a row if we assume to drop your backups in #'s 1&2 (2 card monte and Quick as a Wink). That's 4 effects in a row with the same basic outcomes. I'd get bored watching that, wouldn't you?
2) You seem to be in the information overload stage of learning magic that so many of us go through. You have so many tricks you like to do that you have a hard time narrowing them down to a polished routine.
3) Have some faith that what you think makes a good routine is probably better than what we could tell you based on your listing what effects you do. Do what you like, man, you'll be a better magician that way.
Pj
and i know what you mena by learning all that material is bad, but ive been in magic for about a year now and it seems kinda dumb to me that i should only be doing 2 or 3 tricks after all that time of learning magic. you know what i mean?