Search results

Me either, all of your threads obviously have a lot of thought behind them (unlike most threads here) but I can never seem to understand them.

Technically we don't know that this one can't be done looking down.

That was pretty funny when you went for the Bikes, and when you grabbed the scissors.

Happy Birthday!

I finally found a place to film, there is a farmer's market tomorrow. I will have footage ready soon!

...but apparently easier...

If there were flashy effects and a girl in a tight leather jumpsuit you would totally buy it.

Ok, I re-read that section like six more times, and it makes sense now. The part that applies to us is: "or participating in any other organized effort that in any way artificially alters the results of Digg's services" I get what you're saying now. That part right there is just a little...

Wow, looks very cool. Daniel Madison says that it's easy, so I'll probably check it out.

Ok, I read the TOS again, and how I am interpreting it what we did was not in violation of the terms of service. If someone can better explain it, then I'll be happy to change my mind.

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I HATE THESE THREADS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Split Spades by the way. You know what, I'm going to make a list of threads I never want to see: wuts ur fav deck? If you were one card sleight, what would you be? What's the Point of Doing Magic...

Yes, I read the TOS a couple of times. We did not manipulate the Digg count. Manipulating it would be doing something like one person creating multiple accounts so that they could Digg it a bunch of times. The only reason all of us are digging this is because we like the video. Isn't that the...

Follow Steven Levitt on Twitter. http://twitter.com/steven_levitt You can follow the interesting life of a man...who...is...interesting. Waiting for his tweets will keep you on the edge of your seat at all hours of the day. His tweets have been described as: "...riveting..."...

Welcome to the forums, and make sure to read the rules!

Wow very good, the editing was very good except for a few rough spots from about 1:30 to 1:50. I didn't really like the definitions flashing on the screen during the video, but other than that I really enjoyed. It looks like you put a lot of work into this.

Alright thanks.

No, we did not artificially increase the amount of diggs, we just created accounts for ourselves so that we could digg the video. It would only be against the TOS if one person created multiple accounts.

But we didn't do any of that.

You took the words right out of my mouth---wait I better Twitter that: "B.A.W.I. took the words right out of my mouth." I understand why bussinesses and celebrities have them, but normal people? Why?

First of all we have six million threads on the Wire. We also have a thread dedicated to Twitter following. In fact it was at the top at the time of your post. Make sure to use the search function.