i resharpened the card image so you can make something out of it w/out the grainyness that onimushalord89 provided. and i zoomed in and there is definatel a line/separation between the 2 spade-like figures. http://www.flickr.com/photos/42664818@N05/5210430893/
no, its not supposed too. at least i dont think. i think they were just to throw them in. but as my orders being downloads i dont know what they will do
i ordered 50$ worth of dvds and stuff. but theyre all downloads. so will i get my browns wynns or white centurions!?!?!? i better! so i hope jb or someone will read this.
i happen to be a junior member, and they probably just want the presentation to be better...that will just come with experience (time) a lot of the time its the presentation and not just your skill.
When you wash your hands every 5 minutes so your sweat doesnt warp your deck.
When you drop a deck a tear forms in your eye.
When you notice that theres only 456 decks in your drawer rather than 457.
As Casey Stated, the Sentinels are great long lasting cards. i know i got a brick and they started getting a little clumpy, but i let them breathe and they were fine within an hour. Another issue is using them in certain performance situations. Some spectators will view them as trick decks.
As...
Heres my guesses. (Updated)
1. Jason England
2. Homer Liwag
3. Chris Kenner
4. Dan Buck
5. Tony Chang
6. Daniel Madison
7. Jon Raiker
8. David Buck
9. Daniel Garcia
10. Dan Sperry
11. Jonathan Bayme
Heres my guesses.
1. Jason England
2. Homer Liwag
3. Chris Kenner
4. Dan Buck
5. Tony Chang
6. Daniel Madison
7. Jon Raiker
8. Zach Mueller (zachmonky)
9. Daniel Garcia
10. Dan Sperry
11. Jonathan Bayme
Cut me some slack, i am a 14 year old who has never spent time drawing a face ever. and the image is flipped. with that being said, heres the buck twins. http://www.flickr.com/photos/42664818@N05/4980701397/