I got my wheels spinning the other day when I was watching (and listening) to my friend absolutely shred away on his guitar. Music, guitar in particular, and soloing even more particular, is a peculiar institution. As an art, music really just a medium of expression. If one person plays the same as the other person, no one really criticizes them. If a burgeoning guitarist plays Led Zeppelin songs, is he committing a crime? Or is he just playing it because he enjoys it?
I raised a similar question to myself about Cardistry and the Art of Flourishing: is Cardistry public domain? Can one person perform a move invented by someone else and really be called a thief, or perhaps at worst just "unoriginal?" Is it really a crime to mimic someone else's moves, and not claim them as your own?
I personally feel that Cardistry as an art is under public domain. Many people share technique on simple things like fans, swing cuts, deck flips, etc., but when it comes to other more complex flourishes, people are reluctant to say more than mum.
What does everyone else think? And by all means, crucify my opinion, but respect the fact that there is always more than one way to look at an issue, and to debate the points, not the person.
Sun|Sky
I raised a similar question to myself about Cardistry and the Art of Flourishing: is Cardistry public domain? Can one person perform a move invented by someone else and really be called a thief, or perhaps at worst just "unoriginal?" Is it really a crime to mimic someone else's moves, and not claim them as your own?
I personally feel that Cardistry as an art is under public domain. Many people share technique on simple things like fans, swing cuts, deck flips, etc., but when it comes to other more complex flourishes, people are reluctant to say more than mum.
What does everyone else think? And by all means, crucify my opinion, but respect the fact that there is always more than one way to look at an issue, and to debate the points, not the person.
Sun|Sky