I smell something fishy

Jul 5, 2010
115
0
BEHIND YOU
I noticed (as most of us did) that on the SMOKE&MIRRORSv5 page there are 22 reviews! Now if you look at the date one them... Well some of them are from 2008. I think that they moved all of the reviews from v4 to v5. And if you look on the "Playing Cards" page, SMOKE&MIRRORSv4 is gone.

I could be completely wrong but that's what I think.
 
Nov 7, 2010
68
0
I saw a post where they said that the finish and stock was exactly the same, so aside from aesthetics and the box the reviews should be reliable for v5's
 
Jun 10, 2010
1,360
1
I noticed (as most of us did) that on the SMOKE&MIRRORSv5 page there are 22 reviews! Now if you look at the date one them... Well some of them are from 2008. I think that they moved all of the reviews from v4 to v5. And if you look on the "Playing Cards" page, SMOKE&MIRRORSv4 is gone.

I could be completely wrong but that's what I think.

Why would they keep S&M v4s up when those are sold out and v5s are in stock? And they've moved all the reviews over for all the cards...
 

j.bayme

ceo / theory11
Team member
Jul 23, 2007
2,849
358
New York City
The S&Mv5 share the same product page that the four editions before it occupied. If we created a new product page with each reprinting of a deck, we'd have about 10 pages for the Guardians and two in the past four weeks for the Sentinels. I don't believe that is efficient. The product reviews you see for the Smoke & Mirrors are for all editions, not just the latest printing.
 
The S&Mv5 share the same product page that the four editions before it occupied. If we created a new product page with each reprinting of a deck, we'd have about 10 pages for the Guardians and two in the past four weeks for the Sentinels. I don't believe that is efficient. The product reviews you see for the Smoke & Mirrors are for all editions, not just the latest printing.

Are newer reviews of more current editions ranked higher than older ones?

J.
 
Searching...
{[{ searchResultsCount }]} Results