This is kind of depressing for me. Not trying to change you're mind. For me, its just different. "Magicians are storytellers. Focus on telling the best story you can with whoever you want. There are enough rules in magic." You are probably not a business major, you are a guy that can change an emotion. Which is more powerful than being a professional. Also this kind of thought is why magic isn't breaking the boundaries, like almost every other art form.
You know this refers to a professional magician, right?
I think that magic isn't "breaking any boundaries like almost any other art form" because of the generally low level of craft. And that, I feel, is because people keep performing new material before it's been really mastered, and not working things until they achieve some level of mastery. The best story is one that practised, and perfected through repeated performance. There's a need for instant gratification these days, and that runs counter to the need for magic to be practiced to a high level before being performed.
How often do you figure that Gazzo or Kozmo or Jimmy Talksalot change their acts? Rarely if ever. You can look at pretty much any clip of Gazzo doing the cups and balls, and i'd be surprised if more than a half-dozen lines change from performance to performance. And it kills - because it's tight, the patter is as good as it can be, and he performs it really well. That's just not possible when you do something new all the time. You can learn something from every performance.
Any band that tours plays pretty much the same songs from one concert to the next, any stage actor says the same lines in the same play for a long run, a comedian does the same routine night after night, and it's through that honing of skill through performance that greatness is really brought forth. Why should we be any different? Gregory Wilson said something along the lines of not wanting to see someone's newest trick, he wants to see the one they've done 1,000 times.
So if we do not use the science that investigates the principles governing correct or reliable inference, we live in fear? It does not follow.