January 18th, 2009

danielMadison - Glitch

"An instant, visual color change. One card visually changes into another with a smooth flourish. A simple and effective color change done with finesse. See details here.

d+M

37 Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

Lobato16 years ago

Very clean, very nice and very SWEET!!

Evgeny_Pluzhnikov17 years ago

Wow. looks that this change SURROUNDED! :) Realy nice idea Daniel. I like it at all! VISUAL!!! :)

stanhimself17 years ago

T11 is just tryna make quick $. Really.. Who would release this? Maybe yes people will buy it. But still. The peview had it sorted for me.

Holyshnikes17 years ago

Why does anyone have to defend it? Some of the people on this forum just don't make sense. Either its people complaining about a trick in the 1 on 1 or they are complaining that Theory11 didnt post a 1 on 1 this week. Its a nice move, either you like D&D's version better or Madison's (or make up your own version) it makes no difference. You don't like it don't buy it. But let everyone else make their own decisions on that. ::HS::

TheBlack&WhiteIllusionist17 years ago

You hit the nail my friend.

Thecardster717 years ago

I think DM has to defend it, not JB.. ,cheers

FrankAb17 years ago

Love this - looks so smooth.

Gianni17 years ago

thats my DAWG

cdwonderist17 years ago

You know I like the whole thing, from the handling(spin) and the actual change; but for a variation of something that's been out for awhile maybe it should only cost 2.95. All in all great thinking. Because c'mon how many different variations could you come up with for one move. Especially with a decent clean up. D+M= equals I won't but this but appreciate the cleverness.

Jeremy C.17 years ago

i don't get why people would buy this, one can easily learn this from the preview because it's obvious.

TheBlack&WhiteIllusionist17 years ago

It looks fluid and more natural. Trying to look at it like a laymen, it kinda looks like it just comes out of nowhere. Like, "Ooo look at the way it spins... wait, what?". Maybe that's just me though. I think d+M did good with it. I give him props (no, not the cards lol)

Ampersan534017 years ago

There's almost zero difference from the click change in the trilogy. open your eyes boys and girls, they're scammin you.

Ampersan534017 years ago

Your right Jonathan, but why make a much more awkard and different variation? Dai Vernon always makes a good point about trying to make it look as natural as possible and if you're the spectator you should ask yourself ," Why did he do that? Why did he make it spin off the bottom?" The snap change is just more natural and much more appealing for a card magician. The click change made it one handed with an instant clean-up. Essentially, most all magicians know how to do a snap change so your essentially just buying a twirl. But that's just my opnion.

cardmasterseth17 years ago

Thank God that JB is here to defend every single artist on his website. Seriously. I'm going to agree with Ampersan. Just because he adds a flourishy new move to reveal the initial card and just because the card ends on the BOTTOM (GASP! WHAT AN ADVANTAGE THAT MUST BE!) does not mean that its a different move. the CHANGE itself is exactly. . . EXACTLY the same. \ cheers, seth

j.bayme17 years ago

The handling is entirely different. The flourish spin is entirely different. And the end position is entirely different. Therefore, this is just as original a change as the Click Change. To each his own, but there is no "scamming" - just a pretty slick move.

Holyshnikes17 years ago

Oh and by the way...the ending to this is hilarious.

spades17 years ago

^Exactly, the snap change is great, and you do want a clean up. Personally I think I'll prefer this to the click change, it's about personal preference. Cool release, wonder what else will be coming from DM...

Holyshnikes17 years ago

I fail to see how telling people to not waste their money is helping. It is obviously a little differnt of a hold on the deck and let's be honest, everyone has different methods of doing things that they like better. I for one, like to try and have a variety of differentmethods of changing the cards so why not have one more? Thanks D.

JamesAV30517 years ago

Because they are charging 5 dollars for a slight variation on a very well known move... I think that most peoples issue with it, not that Madison shouldn't be teaching this variation because its similar to the click change or Marlo's original, but because such a slight variation really shouldn't cost 5 dollars.

vipercard17 years ago

I fail to see how this is better than the click change. It's great to know that the card ends on the bottom, but it's a pretty obvious and unoriginal change if you ask me.

visualartist17 years ago

Then just dont buy it. Not everyone knows the click change and some prefer to use this one.

Decksterity17 years ago

except the bottom of the deck is now well..

PTG17 years ago

The click change has a different grip and so does the snap change. The 'move' is even done with different fingers... Give him a break. No, it isn't mindblowingly original, but it is still pretty sweet looking. 5/5 from me Daniel. -PTG

PTG17 years ago

Plus he even credits them, he isn't claiming it to be an original idea,..

17 years ago

woot! Daniel Madison rocks!

Izzy17 years ago

This looks a lot easier than the click change.

Tenkai17 years ago

Eh, I'll stick to the snap change. Save your money!