🕷️ NEW: SPIDER-MAN JIGSAW PUZZLE 🕷️
July 2nd, 2010

Up

"Only four aces are used. The essential secret isn't new - but I've put a little something interesting into the effect and it's method. Enjoy."

MarkEfferent

6 Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

Retype.SW16 years ago
Ahh I see, fair enough. Apologies for not knowing every corner of every magic book :)
Reply
Retype.SW16 years ago
It's like a set-up version of 4for4. Why make something new, that isn't as good as the original?
Reply
MarkEfferent16 years ago
Thanks glad you liked it, Do you know the name of any of the books that this is in? If you do that would help thanks.
Reply
PTG16 years ago
*sigh* Because 4for4 is the NEW version of this trick. Not the original. The original is as old as the hills and can be found in most card trick books at your local library. The original is basically what you saw here. Chris Kenner revamped it and turned into a switch that didn't need any pre-setup. Why doesn't anyone read good old magic books anymore? :( -PTG p.s. Also, Ampersan, the idea with showing the last ace was originally not to make a big deal out of it. You'd put the first three into the deck whilst pattering and then simply make a joke, and laugh or something while holding the final ace and flashing it non-conspicuously to the specs. They think they saw something that they weren't even supposed to see. They automatically believe that the all the other aces are in the deck, and even believe they are "ahead" and know what's going on. It's all psychological. p.p.s. Awesome vid, btw Mark. I liked the flow of it. :)
Reply
Ampersan534016 years ago
I rememebr see Chris Kenner do that on an old hotel video a long time ago. However, If I were you, I wouldn't show the last ace because if you're going to show me one ace, then why not show me all the aces?
Reply
MarkEfferent16 years ago
I see your point.... and yet, that problem has never come across me when I perform this to people. Magic wasn't meant to be viewed by magicians. But your logic makes sense.
Reply