That's because E know they won't sell many (if any) if it's more expensive. That's also why there was a huge promotion on Pure Smoke leading up to the release of VAPR.VAPR is definitely a better gimmick, but Pure Smoke is cheaper.
DAMN! Another very expensive toy. . . I so don't do this poor thing well. . . Beer budget & Champagne tastes
OK. . . Dear Santa. . .
It really is everything one could ask for when it comes to this kind of technology; especially for doing haunts and seance work.
A RELATED QUESTION: Do any of the existing smoke systems allow for colored smoke?
Watching the bickering over these devices makes me so glad I don't spend money on this sort of thing anymore. Too many moving parts.
That said, out of academic curiosity I'm waiting a few months to see reviews from people who don't believe they have a horse in the race to see if VAPR actually solves the problems inherent to these sorts of devices. There's a rant for another time in there, but I digress. What I'm wondering is how many people who buy these things actually end up using them effectively. This is the sort of thing that's really easy to do badly.
How do you mean? I can understand how some applications would be significantly better than others, but it seems like it would be pretty hard to use something like this (without getting caught) and have it take away from the magical moment or the effect.