Search results

How about loading it into a spectators pocket beforehand? That'd have a pretty dramatic effect. Must be careful when doing these things though, don't want them thinking or even saying out loud "When did you put that there?" "You must've done that earlier" etc. You want them thinking, "how did...

I agree, another example of this might be The Visitor - Larry Jennings. One card impossibly transposes from one half of the deck to the other, rather openly too; very nice effect, not the most visual by any means but yeah. :p - Sean

Figured as much. Have fun driving yourself insane over CHANGE. :D - Sean

Team up on you? Thrall and I stumbled into this thread of our own accord? Thrall has a girlfriend, and I have a boyfriend and if that last sentence was some kind of smarmy comment at my sexuality, then that tells me the exact kind of person you are and I need no longer waste my time arguing...

IF the change in the video in question is his original method and is indeed released at all. - Sean

Exactly. But magicians don't like being deceived I guess. Obviously it makes them less of a magician or something. :rolleyes: But you don't KNOW. The most important thing here you've said is the following: "Looks exactly like a blink card to me!". So it's not fact... It just looks like one...

I may and or may not have meant that. >_> :p - Sean P.S. so far, two people have claimed that D+M's people or himself have said something or other. So far two people have failed to back this up.

Same reason Armando Lucero charges Over $2000 for his workshops. - Sean

Just to play Devil's Advocate, can I have that in the form of a direct quote and link please? - Sean

Now you're just deceiving yourself. :p I'm just messin'. - Sean

Exactly. But zomgz, if I am deceptivized how can I be g00d magishinz?:rolleyes: - Sean

Was that an entry? Did I miss it? My bad. >_> :p Heehee, nice job. - Sean

Exposure? Damnit R3man you're useless at keeping secrets. - Sean

Can you show me? :) With a link to a quote if possible. Still though, what if it is? Just because we don't know of a way it might be possible, doesn't immediately mean it has to be a gimmick or camera editing? Contrary to what we might think, yes we're magicians, but no we don't by default know...

Has anyone actually said that CHANGE is? Anyone with knowledgeable credibility, as in Daniel Madison or R3man? - Sean

Wow. Awesome winner :D Can't believe that no-one did Snakes on a Wayne though. Coming soon. 08.08.08. ;) - Sean

Errm... So... TnR isn't very practical because the gimmick is not examinable. But Distortion you were pretty pleased with? That must be because it's examinable right? I find that those who say it's not very practical usually haven't actually tried using it for anyone other than a mirror...

Hmm, JackSyna(ps)ces is a relatively fun one to do. There's an easier way to do the actual 'transposition' bit though as seen in the video. I highly recommend checking that one out, it's one of the simplest in the book. (Other than the self working poker deal ;) ) Have fun with it! And...

Hmm, the more I look at it (on the smoke deck anyway) the less I see the D's and the more I just see a stripy design in the middle. Maybe we're just noticing the D's because we know it's Dan and Dave, I'd be interested to see if anybody who doesn't know this actually asks whether they are D's...

Am I the only one that seems to be missing something about the smoke deck... I don't see any pictures of them... Nor in the teaser video. - Sean