Search results

Well.now we can only hope they make one.

Ive always believed D+M's version.when he was on bbc. Apologies to dannyT.I had assumed that was the interview he was talking about for some reason.

Yeah its pretty cool. I saw this about a year ago.i think. It was a long f'ing time ago though.

Glad to see someone that understands it. I smell an academy award nomination.(maybe not best picture but who knows..) what could go wrong with director fernando mierelles behind the cameras.

I know right. it went off topic quick. haha.

http://www.blindness-themovie.com/spreadblindness/?urli=394 Ive wanted to post an off-topic thread for a while now. So here it is. Do not blow this off as another epidemic film.Its not about that at all. This is the type of film where substance seeks form.not form substance. I trust most...

well see,i bought the guardians to use them in my performances.if i want to use distortion i wouldnt want to switch cards in the middle of the performance,or just have to use red backs throughout the whole performance. It becomes tiresome.and i bought the guardians to use them for magic.

Darn you toby!you beat me to the punch. haha

This has been discussed before actually The ten theories of magic are as follows,but not neccesarily in that order. 1.production 2.vanish 3.transposition 4.transformation 5.multiplication 6.penetration 7.restoration 8.suspension 9.levitation 10.mentalism. Hope that answers your question.

Hey all, I have recieved word that theory11 administrators are in the talks of possibly making a guardian distortion gimmick. Many of you (like me) have bought the guadians when they were first released. they were the first t11 cards since the time they were released its been going on almost a...

Its taught in the everythingelse disc of the trilogy. usin one card though. but you can figure out for yourself to do the four card production after youve mastered the move.

Since he lives here in the US its tomorrow actually.for us.

They didnt look at all skeptical.Criss said he had picked his most hardcore skeptics and they just didnt look/act the part. His whole performance he did,to me, was pretty obvious in the method.

Yesterdays new show was about skeptics. I didnt want to start a new thread so im posting my question here. my question is how do you guys/gals feel about him challenging three of his skeptics and trying to convince them that what you see is what you get? Do you think he's implying that he has...

I feel he's releasing too many effects too soon. God knows i respect and love D+M but...I dont know.it might not even be an effect. hopefully its a performance videos..Id buy it if it was...

it depends on what factors you mean. i feel flourishing is easier because its just dexterity and dedication. magic relies more on your character on how well you speak with your spectators,how to handle hecklers,creativity along with dexterity and dedication. but as stated before,they both have...

And then he never even showed what happened to the guy he cut up.

Grand Prairie.why?

It has been known that he is a big fan of films,so maybe those characters are his favorite and actually inspired him in some way. By the way if you liked revolver you should check out lock,stock and two smoking barrels. And the more popular SNATCH.

He(criss) presented it as an escape.Not magic or an illusion. Its supposed to be a stunt.just like houdini did and how david blaine did. The only difference is they are real escape/endurance artists. Criss claimed to be a magician and escape artist and he's not. Since escape is not even...