Search results

I live in canberra but our whole house is moving to the Gold Coast in about two weeks.

I am with Draven there have been so many better releases in the last year. However if we were to use your list as the only criteria then my top five would be. Angle Zero Bad influence Lapse (original handling found in one) Stairway I don't know that's about everything that I have or...

In your first post you talked about the coin bend and I have seen a lot of magicians butcher that effect whilst trying to be mentalists. As for the card to impossible location intellectually it is better to have the card signed. However if that is the case then for most methods you need to...

The point I was trying to make is that you can use a better created method to achieve the same if not a better effect without the need for over proving through signing a card.

This is a brillant effect that has so many more applications thanjust a simple number reveal. Anyone who has Luca Volpe's new DVD download there is a great DD that can use this principle as s convincer to destroy the method of the.

Hey Mikk I have two questions for you; 1. Did you get into that school? 2. How is the new stage show coming along.

Yes card to impossible location is much better to have the card signed. If we were to take a similar effect Angle Zero would this effect be that much stonger witha signed card?

Will this be your first lock Dee? Anyway I understand all the hype about change but sometimes we just have to accept the idea that maybe it should be left to the way side like 51 Faces North and the Berglas Effect.

I agree with you to an extent. Obviously signing an object elimantes the idea of duplicate or switched in objects. It also makes the effect have slightly more meaning. The real question I feel that should be asked is how can I eliminate these procedures. I feel that if I ask a spectator to...

Well his most expensive one is the bottom deal and that is only $15. Whilst this is a lot of money for one move it is taught for half an hour. I have seen DVDs that teach everything on foundations that total not much more than half an hour. Remember Jason is one if not the worlds best at...

You believe something is cheating? Isn't everything we do as magicians cheating. I mean 'your card goes back in the middle'.

I don't see too much if a problem of putting magic on YouTube if it is done well. However it is so often done poorly. I see the battle forums that state things like no editing that affects the effect. Whislt this is fine in our context as we are judging on presentation aswell as technical skill...

It's not too bad has all his old psych forces of different cards. And about three effects that look like they are psych forces however they sleight dependent. The Psycho deck can and will kill if you put the effort into the presentation.

Derren's 3 card routine is a thing of beauty. If I ever did a sit down card magic show I would probably use something that like that.

For XCM they may look alright, however for magic they would look terrible. In a pure visual aspect though I do like them.

I was just wondering what effect that you have in the back of your mind but you have never performed. There could be many reasons for this; the sleights the setup up or the presentation. Maybe even you think you are not good enough to perform it with justice. I would like to know what it is and...

Coming from someone with close to two thousand posts on a Magic forum.

I am sure that this uses the Quad - Helix Riffle. If not I am completly stumped.

I use a lot of marked decks but not for anything like most people. I personally think that the worst effect you can do with a marked deck is a classic forcesque. If I am working I usally use either a reverse stacked marked deck.