That's not what I'm saying at all! I'm saying that no matter what method is used, the audience only cares about the effect, so method only has value to magicians. Conversely, if a magician did something with the same method, but presented it in different effects, the audience would be entertained, but the magician would not. In this regard, the only way to satisfy both parties is to use sleight. If I just used a gimmick deck for three hours, sure I could entertain spectators, but I would be bored out of my mind.You're saying that the way to measure the value of a method is how the audience perceives it.
I think in your perspective, you're looking at it only from the spectators eyes. In mine, I'm looking at both sides. Granted, the audiences view takes precedence, but you can't discount the performer. If I wasn't interested or engaged in my performances, how can I be expected to truly convey an equal sense of wonder in my audience?