Yes but most of it was not, especially in comparison to PS3 and PS1.
You're saying that half of it was, but most of it was not? lol... But I get the comparison thing, that's fair enough.
Also I didnt like the presentation points
I can't see how you wouldn't, but that's fair enough.
and the fact that it teaches facts about the brain that TO ME was useless.
Ok, that, for lack of a better word, just seems ridiculous. You want to learn psychological magic without learning about the brain?! Maybe you should take up sponge balls if you don't want to learn about the brain. If you were a medium, or some other sort of mentalist, that would be a reasonable comment, but it stands to reason that if you want to perform psychological magic, you should understand what you're performing. Maybe a specific fact will never be useful to you in any practical sense, but trying to perform psychological magic without general knowledge of the brain is like trying to perform card magic without knowing what a double lift is - even if you never use a double lift, you should still know it, and knowing it makes you a better card magician.
Also some of the psychological effects just weren't new but used ps1 work. I didnt use them. One effect has a description that it is impromptu when it actually has a Massive set up. I forget what the name was.
Fair enough.
Anyway that is MY opinion and therefore there is not much point arguing your opinion. I just did not find it useful at all.
I find most aspects of your opinion fair enough (bar the obvious one). I don't have any desire at all to argue with your opinion, and I think most of them are reasonable. It's just that opinions are limited by perception, and I felt your perception was, in turn, slightly limited through fallacy.
