how impromtu is thread ?
It is impromtu although there is a slight setup.
So wouldn't that mean... it's not impromptu? My definition of impromptu is being able to do it on the spot, anywhere, anytime, with any prop that you need for the trick (i.e. any piece of thread, any deck of cards, any coin, etc.). If there's set-up, this doesn't match that definition... for me, anyway.
So wouldn't that mean... it's not impromptu? My definition of impromptu is being able to do it on the spot, anywhere, anytime, with any prop that you need for the trick (i.e. any piece of thread, any deck of cards, any coin, etc.). If there's set-up, this doesn't match that definition... for me, anyway.
I'm with adjones on this one.
oh ok. Well if I'm not misaken the "official" meaning of impromtu is no gimmicks. It has no gimmicks.
oh ok. Well if I'm not misaken the "official" meaning of impromtu is no gimmicks. It has no gimmicks.
Even card tricks that just require one specific card on the top of the deck, I don't consider impromptu.
I beg to differ in this aspect, if I am handed a deck of cards, I could do an 'impromptu' trick that required a certain card on top quite easily. Take Hoffzy Osbourne for example, minor setup. Yet in the Trilogy, a method is taught so that you can do it on the fly. I would class it as impromptu; it still uses a setup. Just my thoughts...