Search results

You better be having all the cards selected in a Hindu shuffle or the like. But the real method is just openly cut it to the bottom.

I still use the Hoy Book test it is far and away the best impromptu book test. The Brook Test is another brillant book test. My personal routine with books is based on the Hoy Test. Without a book my invisible book test uses the BMBT TC and the other amazing Hoy idea (the Rashmon...

I used to use the context of an estimation cut. I would classic pass cut the cards down to get close to the card. A while pack Prae and I discussed the effect at some length on the forums.

want to say the plot is mine but I cannot be certain. I have looked around and found nothing on it anywhere. I'd Sheree the method if you really would like it threatehead.

The answer is too many to count. Personally I like my variation because it the card in the spread is not changed but the spread itself changes to be the mates for the selected card.

I use to be the same way, it was only at the start though the more that I got into it the less I worried. So my advice to you is perfrom for a friend or something first where you know that you can mess up. Once you start to perform everything else just seems to just fall into place.

It is a beautiful change and as for it's practicality I don't see how you can say that. Yes the multiple change may come off as a little too much but if you look at the preview where Kelvin does the four aces with the red accro's the change happens at about the same angle as any other colour...

With all of your effects being so out of the box, did this come from your personal desire to be unique or more to have your magic being unique? Futhermore with being unique (effect and/or presentation character etc.) how has this affected you both positively and negatively?

Either a DB or a red blue DB everything that looks like a gaff card does not play well for me and it shows through performance.

I am very critical of my effects and the subtle things that I do to make them work. After every effect I create both the method and presentation change slightly over the course of the life of the effect to the point where I am happy with it. This can be a very short period my close up out of...

Before I give any advice are we talking actual stage magic or just stand up parlour. They are completly different things and whilst mentalism is a good suggestion if it is played off as a trick the effects are not very clever.

I am with prae on this one. It I am hired to perform I will flat out say so, I see using magic as an intro about as effective as a pick up line in a club. If however I was at a party just chilling usally someone will bring up the fact that I am a performer. If not after several beers I...

Nice idea chicken I might have to have a play with that.

I use shapes and fruits as the first Chunnel.

Without tipping too much of the method use shapes. As for the routiune prae give us a call

I might it is more of a stage piece anyway.

Prae I will send you a pm when I get home.

Wow I can see why you are disappointed with them. The only part I can really fault with the review is that it is a horrible idea. The idea itself was quite clever I thought however the exercusion was not there. Have you tried a reverse change method though. Maybe force the 4S on a spectator then...

Personally when I have done LV card cheating routines in the past I have wanted a slight flash on my pass so the audience can see something. Afterwards I would go more on to an ACR in terms of methodolgy so they have no chance to see anything.

There are a few things I do not like about his pass, most of these however are more personal prefence then anything else. It is a very forceful pass in the sense he is tense, even if the spectator doesn't see the pass they know something is happening. This is great for a colour change but not...