I was wondering, after listening yet again the words of The Professor regarding simplifying the amount of moves a sleight needs until if ye took but one more away, it would crumble. I was wondering, though, if this applied to the same sleight (example: double turnover reduced into double lift (those who own Aaron Fisher's Card Fundamentals 101 will understand this point perfectly)) or, if it applies as well within switching this sleight for that, as an example: control to the bottom of the deck and bottom palm into a diagonal palm shift. This example uses sleights (on both cases) that have good angles and take little time, so I really reffer to things like such. In another case that might include particular angles, for instance, it would depend on the situation; but when it really can be either?
