Both of them have their strong points and weak points. I personally love holding a book in my hands and reading it, but with Kindle and many other ebook readers you can now have a large library with you on the go, the books never get that yellowish tinge to them and can you imagine trying to carry a bunch of books with you on a long flight and trying to decide on which one you want to read?!
For magic too, Ebooks give you the ability to read that one book that would have cost you $150 and gone out of print within a week.
I understand this, kind of agree with it, but loathe it at the same time. To me eBooks are a kind of rip-off in that you cannot resell them like I can my physical collection. Digitally I have over 1,500 books but my physical library is plagued by notebooks from where I've printed off some of those books and bound them so I can grab them and look things up more readily than I can using an electronic device. I can likewise highlight things, make margin notes (I really trash my books because they are for studying, not for looks). I can't do those things with my eBooks nor can I donate them them to whatever group or individual I choose when I finally draw that last breath. . .
How does one legally pass on their library given today's digital addiction?
I've recently been plagued with the .drm suffix on eBooks that more or less require one to work with a Reader service like Readmill or try to figure out how to activate a certain program within Acrobat . . . techies make it sound easy but I've yet to figure it out... but the pain in the butt is, I can't make a physical copy for my personal files -- a hard copy as back-up for those wonderful days when everything crashes around you. . . personally, I'm tired of having to repurchase things I once had on disc and have learned to back things up with a hard copy when they are an article of value. Can't do that with this suffix and it's getting so ridiculous with the copyright laws that we won't be able to do it much longer, period. "They" are trying to criminalize the idea of being a good person that shares with a partner or co-hobbyist, anything and everything.
$150.00 books that go out of print in a week. . . while an exaggeration the truth behind their short life is so as to limit just how many people get the advantage behind the information. Derren Brown (long before his fame) had a book that he made 13 copies of and one I think there were on 6 copies to world wide. They sold for thousands of dollars in some cases. Just like Jerome Finley and Neal Scryer the idea is that a.) only the serious workers are going to pay the price; and b.) only such people will appreciate the nuggets of wisdom being shared because it's all from a PROFESSIONAL perspective. Usually such tomes are marketed with a disclaimer that says only X number of books will be released or that it's a limited time offer. I have several books coming out between now and this time next year that have time limits on them, if you don't purchase them during that time period you don't get the information, end of story. . . and we are adding security measures to make certain these books stay limited.
When it comes to physical books, outside the idea of a limited run, which isn't that unusual, I know of no book that falls under that point you have in this line. . . technically such would be impossible unless the book ends up on those non-existent censor lists. . .