My first "mentalism" show!

Feb 4, 2008
959
3
Well the show was a real hit and I am hoping to move it to a bigger venue this coming fall. Here are some highlights. My regular camera went 8TFU just before the show so the video quality was really dark on the camera I used. :( Oh well, I had a great time and judging by my audience reactions and conversations afterward they did to so that's all that really matters. Big thanks to DiceR and Prea for some tips they gave me a few months back on how to better present my PK Pixel routine. Still a work in progress but it is much improved.

http://vimeo.com/25577130
 
Mar 6, 2008
1,483
4
A Land Down Under
Hey Erik

I enjoyed it, there are a few things that I would work on. With the PK-ixel (see what I did there) i would do another haunted deck effect first, maybe something with loops, the one Derren uses on TDP or my personal favourite Scared by Jamie Dawes. By framing it in this way you would have a reference point as to what is suppose to happen when the specator tries the effect. The card shooting out of the rubber ban will be enough of a different to still startly the audience member.

I would to have loved to have seen more of the confab routine if you want I coudl share my ideas on how to avoid the main flaw of the confab routine.
 
Feb 4, 2008
959
3
Hey Erik

I enjoyed it, there are a few things that I would work on. With the PK-ixel (see what I did there) i would do another haunted deck effect first, maybe something with loops, the one Derren uses on TDP or my personal favourite Scared by Jamie Dawes. By framing it in this way you would have a reference point as to what is suppose to happen when the specator tries the effect. The card shooting out of the rubber ban will be enough of a different to still startly the audience member.

I would to have loved to have seen more of the confab routine if you want I coudl share my ideas on how to avoid the main flaw of the confab routine.

Thanks. There is actually a lot I plan on working on...This is just the beginning. I think I'm kind of hooked! That is a good idea for the haunted pack to set this up. My current character is basically a hypnotist who also uses the power of persuasive linguistics. Using those skills I give off the "impression" of supernatural mind-reading skills. The climax of those skills is a drawing dupe. I then give a speel about how, just because I don't have any supernatural abilities doesn't necessarily mean they don't exist. I then ask for people who have had supernatural experiences, Ghost sightings, UFO sightings, Moving stuff with their mind, and just "Thinking about someone and the next moment they call on the phone." I keep it pretty broad so I should get at least a few people who raise their hand. I then use a pseudo induction so they can "tap into their energy," and proceed from there. So for that reason I just go straight into this.

The confab routine-I'd love to hear some of your ideas on that. Originally the message supposed to be in a pill capsule that was in the glass vile, that was in the box. The capsules I had are VERY susceptible to humidity! We have just had three days of pouring rain. By the time I was ready to load the message in the capsule, the darn thing had virtually dissolved! Anyways I'd be happy to exchange ideas on confab with you. It has always been one of my favorite mentalism effects but I have read almost no confabulation routines. What I have is mostly from watching others perform it and then going through PMM and 13 Steps to find the methods that seem most applicable. I'm sure I am probably doing it the hard way!

P.S.....PK-ixel...Love it!
 
Feb 4, 2008
959
3
No...I don`t know what you mean...

80s era Punk slang where people in the "in" crowd would, when referring to the best Punk bands, claim that they "sucked" hoping to keep the "posers" out.....either a referance to that or he thinks mentalism sucks ;)
 
Dec 18, 2007
1,610
14
66
Northampton, MA - USA
Mentalism sucks if you know what I mean. :)

So does most of magic. . . if you know what I mean.

Mentalism/Magic ONLY SUCK when the performer is poor and as was said long ago, "Good Magic is like Good Sex, it's Just Harder to Find."

When it comes to your personal views alex2011, that's all they are and as such, you didn't need to post them just to get your post count up. Not only does it reveal to others the level of your immaturity but likewise, your lack of respect for the art as a whole.

As to The Video. . . (and pardon my being a stickler on things) what you did wasn't a "show" but an "act" -- a short bit in a coffee house or dinning hall of some sort and for a relatively small handful of folks. I point this out only so you can understand that there's a huge difference when it comes to such things; this sort of bit is what many pros do for earning a bit of pocket money and pass the time. Many of us will break into a set of this sort when at the pub with a group of friends just to break in new material or out of boredom. A "Show" on the other hand, is a bit more formal in setting and most usually involves more than five or six people; I say "usually" because mentalism is unique when it comes to how it can and traditionally has, pandered to much smaller groups. This is a very intimate art form that does not necessarily require a big room and lots of people (traditional mentalism worked in people's living-rooms/parlors more than it did theaters and night clubs).

The other sticky point I wish to bring out, and it's not to be mean to you but to help you think a bit as you move further into mentalism, and that is the use of playing cards. I'm not one of those that are absolutely bitterly anti-playing card but at the same time I strongly discourage their use when and wherever possible. If you have an effect your like then come up with an alternative prop by which to present it; photos, postcards, business cards, sketches, I've used match book covers and coasters from different places I've eaten or drank in. The reason for this is very simple; Mentalism depends upon the creation and investment of belief from your audience into what you are doing vs. the suspension of belief we find in magic where the audience understands it's all tricks -- smoke & mirrors. Believability is the goal in mentalism and to achieve this we must side-step those things that create doubt, which playing cards do; they are something tied to professional gambling as well as trickery and thus, the public already associates them with deception and something readily manipulated. So think on this and how you might be able to improve upon your card-trick selections by creating a different storyline/presentation that allows for the logical use of an alternative prop.

The PK material has already been touched upon but it goes with all demonstrations; frame them in a way that not only allows it to build with intensity and seeming challenge/impossibility, but likewise in a way that allows you to literally set the audience up for the big surprise. When I was doing PK in my club act one of the big features was the Bending Wine Glass. We didn't bring this out until the last part of the routine which started off with my stopping a couple of watches and explaining a genuine medical condition that roughly 1 in every 25 people are born with; an increased level of bio-electrical-magnetism. Don't laugh, the condition can be quite limiting and even dangerous for those hosting the more acute aspects of the condition. I use this legit malady however, as my explanation around PK and then build.

When we finally got to the wine glass there were times when it wouldn't bend all the way but rather, shatter as it was bending. We didn't do this every show but only here and there so it would become a matter of legend -- word-of-mouth PR, which is the direction you are probably wanting to move to with your bit, it just wasn't framed in a manner that will allow such.

Try to stay away from the more "commercial" stuff that everyone else does if you want to be seen as "unique" and more than another hack-magician that wants to be the next Derren Brown or whomever else that was on TV recently with a neat trick you now possess.

For a first go, you did ok. You must understand however, applause and kudos during the act does not necessarily mean you did a "good job" as a Mentalist but rather, you amazed folks by way of your tricks. I know that sounds strange so I'll put it this way; when Banachek was younger he'd check to see how the public reacted to his bits. He was looking to see how many people walked away filled with belief in what he did; how many people gave him validation as being "genuine" and even today, people give him credit for being a genuine psychic because he's not on stage doing tricks, he's demonstrating the things he's studied over the years.

The old timers would put it this way, "Neither admit to nor deny your abilities as something esoteric or legit, allow the audience to come to their own conclusions." But in so doing, we are obliged to do the best we can to convince them that we are not employing any sort of trickery and whatever our claim is (being psychic, some kind of expert, etc.) it's genuine.

You may want to invest in some of the older material tied to Mentalism vs. the currently hyped stuff that's out there. It could open your eyes to things.
 
Feb 4, 2008
959
3
Fair enough Craig, Define it how you like. If you want to call it an act then that's what it was. A 50 minute act encompassing 7 different effects, 3 of which were multi-phased, all of the effects followed a consistent theme that was congruent with my character and his "powers." It was performed in front of 20 or more people. I would have called it a small "parlor show" but if you would rather call that an "act" then that's okay with me. The point here is not splitting hairs on the definitions but that I was excited to put into practice some of the performance skills that I have been working on for over a year. I have been a magician for a long time and whatever the heck it was you want to call what I did, it was clear that I'm connecting better with my audience than I have before. That's not to say that I don't have a long way to go to get better, and in that I appreciate any advice, but what I am doing is an improvement over what I was doing before.

As for leaving the question open to my audience about how I do what I do. I certainly thought about that but for now I'm happy leaving the suggestion of otherworldly powers open even if, as a character, I claim none. My character is sort of a reformed used car dealer who, from the get go is telling the audience, "try not to be bullied into saying what I want you to say," and then revealing that they said, or thought, what I had hoped for all along. This effect is currently in the show to demonstrate the possibility of psychokinetic and psychic phenomena. A spectator who has experience something unexplained in his/her life is called on stage, I ask him/her to select a friend from the audience that they are close to. The second participant will be the sender and she(in this case) the receiver. I tell the sender a quick story(actually a verbal force) then ask for her to think of a card but not say it out loud. I show her what I "think" her card might be. I'm off by a bit. Enough to make it believable I was trying to "force" a card on her. Then I tell her that is is no bother because this effect is about the two friends. I tell her to focus on the card she is thinking about and send that thought to her friend. I do the IPI on the receiver. The receiver, once I have supposedly put her in a trance that will help build her psychic energy, then opens a new deck of cards, shuffles the pack, I pick up the pack long enough to put a rubber band on it. Ideally I would have done a bit more build up just prior to the Pixel card flying out of the pack. I need to work a bit on my spectator control and scripting. As you can see she grabs the deck and out comes the card. It still played well and I immediately went with it but ideally she would have just hit the table right after her friend named her thought of card out loud.

As for using a marketed effect?...I wouldn't say that I am really. Not the way I present it. I use pixel as a "tool" much in the same way as someone might use a swami gimmick. The gimmick performs a specific function but the effect you create around that function is what makes it unique.

All and all I am not disagreeing with your critique and you have some valuable points that I will consider. I am just trying to build a show....act...whatever?...that works for me. I want my audience to leave thinking, "gosh...he claimed he wasn't psychic the whole time but there is no other explanation?" To some extent I think I was successful. I didn't know most of the people who came but in chatting with folks after the show...act...whatever...they all seemed quite intrigued. I overheard one gentleman, whom I had hypnotized earlier, stating emphatically that psychics did indeed exist. A friend of mine, who did the filming and basically knows that everything I did was a "trick," said that the one thing she heard over and over at the after-party was references to how I had, "read their minds." She has known me so long that it had never occurred to her that from the perspective of a person who hasn't seen me before, and doesn't know me as "Erik the magic hobbiest," this performance came off less as a "magic show," and more as a "mind reading act."

So, all and all, what I did met my criteria for a successful performance. 1st. People were engaged and entertained for about an hour. 2nd. the show...act...whatever...spurred discussion and excitement after it was over. 3rd. People left wanting more. (they all knew that this was a test run for a show I would like to book in Seoul and just about every person who attended asked me to keep them informed if that happens as they would love to attend)(of course they could just be blowing smoke up my ass but I'm sure most of them were being sincere.) 4th. I was able to redefine my performing character and image. Oh and as a bonus one woman, who had seen Derren Brown's live show, said it was as good as that. (don't worry I'm not getting a big head. I had the advantage of a smaller more intimate environment and she happened to be person holding the key for the final confabulation reveal. I doubt she would have said the same had she been the spectator chosen to come up on Darren's stage and help him unfurl his ginormous confabulation banner! But it was a nice compliment none the less.)
 
Searching...
{[{ searchResultsCount }]} Results