ah got it. so, i should either remove the card tricks, or the non card tricks, and work purely with those?
ok so i should pick a subject, and then chose effects behind that? say i choose natural laws, continuing with the first two, and apply that to all my effects?
It depends on who your audience are, make it relate to them.ok so i should pick a subject, and then chose effects behind that? say i choose natural laws, continuing with the first two, and apply that to all my effects?
ok so i should pick a subject, and then chose effects behind that? say i choose natural laws, continuing with the first two, and apply that to all my effects?
If you're doing a series of card tricks based on the theme of altering probability fields to reduce the chance of a desire outcome to 1 and then suddenly start talking about ghosts when doing a rising card effect, it breaks the flow with an audible, sickening crack.
You know me Alex. I disagree... With Everything!!
I think the effect sounds okay. What's wrong with it besides that loud crack? There is a card trick/count. It is the combination count. How many cards are used for that Alex? (Minus 2 balls and and an English lesson).
hey sorry about the super duper long title,
but, my first routine i'm gonna start doing this summer, and i wanted to get the help of all you guys, I've never done a full routine before, and i wanted your advice on whether or not this sounds good,
-Flow/Frozen talking about the different states of matter and deposition
-stripper deck/ and other tricks with the sevens, talking about superstitions
-sponge balls, talking about the nature of spongeballs, (they attract or make great ear cleaners etc)
-astral projection by jay sankey, talking about mind power
-i thought about doing control for a closer, but. I've been told that its a bad idea,
questions:
-length?
-fluidity?
-better closer?
-maybe changing the order?
-anything at all is welcome
i do plan to take this to the street and busk with this routine, so if that changes anything...
cheers,
web