A jumble of ideas...

wZEnigma

Elite Member
Jun 17, 2009
1,511
153
NE Ohio.
ianchandlerwriting.com
The Junto Session today on waynehouchin.com proved to be thought-provoking. Let me first pose a question that arose in my mind during the chat:

Why are we so eager to prove ourselves to spectators?

Consider doing uncalled-for sleights. Turning over a double then performing a KM move simply to use Shapeshifter. Why are magicians so desperate to take the avenue that is hardest in design but simplest in image?

The magician is not the spectator. In learning the secrets, you give up that privilege and instead become the creator, which alone has its merits. But magicians today have resorted to fool spectators and, more importantly, magicians. How many times do you see a trick being a "magician fooler" used as a selling point?

Get your hands dirty.

Yes, there are routines and tricks in which there are maximum results for minimum effort, but the great ones require skill and deception, two qualities today's performers so often lack. Those who perform at all rely on consistent study of the routine to get them by. The elements of practicing are not valid in a performance setting. The third factor, the spectator, is introduced. Who knows whether or not a trick will be exposed or whether or not you will fail. The responsibility is on the magician. As Houdini said, "It's not the trick. It's the magician."

So many magicians today are more worried about every little detail. I want you to go against every rule. You do not need any books or DVDs or instant downloads or free PDFs to become a good performer. You need experience - getting out there and finding what works and what doesn't. Sure, some books and videos have their merits, but in the end it is all relative to you.

Why rely on the material to give you the image of a magician? Bring the image, and trust the material, not single-handedly rely on it. For instance, I've changed some tricks or patter to adjust performing conditions. If you're standing and everyone else is sitting, are you going to just talk while doing a half pass? No, you divert the attention as according to the situation.

Performance is key, but so is the material. Think of a symbiotic relationship: without one thing, the other dies. Scratch my back and I'll scratch yours. Magic works on the relationship of the trick and the presentation. But those are only 25 percent each. The other 50 percent is the spectator's reactions. What they do will influence what you do.

So in trying so hard to be a magician, we have neglected the fact that you are trying to persuade the spectator into thinking you have complete control over the situation when, in reality, they do. They have no barrier from taking that gimmick from your hands, looking the wrong way during an angly pass, saying that you have two cards instead of one. Convince them otherwise.

How? By being yourself. Don't rely just on outside material. You know what works and what doesn't. Do it. This generation of 12-year-olds who expose effects on YouTube and hardly perform needs to come to a haltering dead end. We have to examine ourselves to present magic in its purest form.

You can read the best books, learn the best material, study 1-on-1 from the most renowned performers and designers, and acquire the highest quality playing cards and the shiniest coins. But they are all a means to an end, a virtual toolbox, a vessel for your personality and presentation. In the end, it's all about you. You do your best and then hope the reaction is good enough. Creating magic is all about that one moment of wonder. You are the key to presenting magic correctly.

Go out, perform, do your best, and find what works.

Ian
 
Aug 13, 2009
67
0
31
Great post. I'm starting to work at getting myself know, and I'm starting to look for opportunities to get gigs. But lately I've been slowing down the process, and finding excuses to do something else instead. And this just inspired me to work harder to get those gigs so that I can perform more. Very inspirational, thank you!
 
Sep 1, 2007
3,786
15
Why are we so eager to prove ourselves to spectators?

Consider doing uncalled-for sleights. Turning over a double then performing a KM move simply to use Shapeshifter. Why are magicians so desperate to take the avenue that is hardest in design but simplest in image?

The magician is not the spectator. In learning the secrets, you give up that privilege and instead become the creator, which alone has its merits. But magicians today have resorted to fool spectators and, more importantly, magicians. How many times do you see a trick being a "magician fooler" used as a selling point?

Are these rhetorical questions? Just thought I'd ask before I shoot my mouth off.
 
Sep 1, 2007
3,786
15
Oh. Saves me the trouble of typing another rant then. And saves my inbox from another torrent of hate mail.
 
Sep 1, 2007
3,786
15
Eh, whatever. If nothing it will give more fuel to the people determined to create a psychological profile of me.

There are three reasons magicians do the unnecessarily complicated **** that they do.

1. They want validation for the hours of work they put into learning.
2. They want to feel like they're part of an exclusive elite.
3. They erroneously correlate complexity with mastery.

These are all very common errors to make, but the problem for magicians is that they screw up your performances and even infect and reduce the effectiveness of performance and rehearsal.

To the first point, a person who truly believes they have nothing to prove to anyone anywhere is very rare. I can tell you right now that I certainly haven't reached that level. And I know only one person off the top of my head who has. So it's understandable that magicians would want someone to assure them that their hard work was worth it.

But as much as our modern culture tries to idealize blood, sweat, and tears, no one is ever really impressed with it. We admire the sublime. We want to see someone effortlessly, gracefully do what they do. We don't want to pull back the curtain and see what they really had to do to get there. Do you really think House would have as many fans if they spent time talking about Dr. House's years in med school and internships at other hospitals before finally becoming a certified diagnostician? **** no! They want to see the sexy parts, like saving the patients, House being a tool to everyone, and Dr. Cuddy's cleavage.

So a lot of the effort magicians put into trying to impress their spectators is a self-sabotaging behavior. They're like a toddler trying to impress their parents, but the relationship doesn't work that way. The magician shouldn't need the approval of the audience in the way he does a mother. And for that matter, the audience has no reason to care about you the way a mother does either. It's a real Catch-22 attitude.

To address the desire to join the elite, this one I think is endemic to magic. The allure of magic is, in part, the ability to control a social situation. To hold the attention of a group. You could not make it more attractive to self-important, arrogant pricks if you taped a mirror to it. I do believe that to be a performer, one must get off on the applause to at least some degree. But the brain adjusts expectations, wants to create new goals, and unfortunately most people fall into the trap of only wanting to go up.

"But Alex," I hear some of you say, "why should we want to go back down?" That's just the problem though. In falling into this trap, your thinking becomes 1-dimensional and you can only think of two ways to go: up or down. You fail to realize that you have the capacity to think in 3 dimensions and can take a whole assload of different directions if you want to.

However in sticking with the thought of only going up, the ego goes into a feedback loop perpetuated by human tribal mentality. When you get right down to it, humans are social creatures. But we're also very cliquish by nature. The reason being that thousands of years ago we lived in tribes. And people who didn't stick with the tribe came down with a bad case of eaten by wolves. Or got their nuts crushed by someone else's tribe. Or just plain starved to death. This has carried over into the modern world. We want to become more valued to our tribe, hence the quest for prestige, power, and social value. Belonging to an exclusive elite seems to promise all three.

The mistake magicians make is in thinking that if they can all fool the common man, the challenge must be in fooling each other. And this ties in with the third point of correlating complexity with mastery.

We are naturally inclined to believe that a complex thing must be a masterwork of design and applied knowledge. I mean, you ever seen the insides of a pocket watch? Jesus cannibal Christ, just looking at it makes my brain hurt. But what many people fail to realize is that just because something looks complex doesn't mean it couldn't be made moreso needlessly. Most traditional watches these days may look insane, but they're actually about as simple as they can get given current engineering technology.

The trouble here is that in their effort to feel like they're a part of the elite, magicians go for the most complicated material imaginable with the idea that it is synonymous with mastery of their skill. And they perform it mistakenly believing that anyone other than them can see that mastery and will reward them for their effort.
 
Jul 13, 2009
1,372
0
35
The Junto Session today on waynehouchin.com proved to be thought-provoking. Let me first pose a question that arose in my mind during the chat:

Why are we so eager to prove ourselves to spectators?

Um duh because we want to make them leave astonished.
But honestly I believe that it is mostly just an ego thing, and it isn’t a good ego thing either. Yes Ego is not necessarily a bad thing.

Consider doing uncalled-for sleights. Turning over a double then performing a KM moves simply to use Shapeshifter. Why are magicians so desperate to take the avenue that is hardest in design but simplest in image?

I believe a better way to phrase the rhetoric question would be “Why are magicians willing to take the avenue that is hardest in design but has the same image as a simpler avenue.” The reason I changed some things in the question is for the reason, not all magicians are in desperate need to over complicate magic.

Hell in the beginning of the session they were talking about a trick where it looked very good and the magician viewing it wanted to know how to do it. Their current thoughts pre of learning the effect is “Holy crap that is a nice trick.” Then once they learn the method they go to, “Holy crap what a ****ty trick.” Example using a t11 product, TNR Mathieu Bich, the people who bought it based off the video demo obviously loved what they were seeing. But then some of those people who bought it deemed it a crap trick because they did not want go through the trouble of making the thing that makes it work.


The magician is not the spectator. In learning the secrets, you give up that privilege and instead become the creator, which alone has its merits. But magicians today have resorted to fool spectators and, more importantly, magicians.

I say the magician is a spectator! Let me explain, when we are performing for participants not only should we be trying to entertain our audience; we as the performers are the spectators of the participants reactions. Also, if magicians are trying to fool their own kind, doesn’t that make magicians spectators anyway?

Yes, there are routines and tricks in which there are maximum results for minimum effort, but the great ones require skill and deception, two qualities today's performers so often lack.

So now you’re saying I should take the harder avenue to be a better performer?


Those who perform at all rely on consistent study of the routine to get them by. The elements of practicing are not valid in a performance setting.
Practicing…Good practicing extends from the bedroom and in front of small crowds.
Who knows whether or not a trick will be exposed or whether or not you will fail. The responsibility is on the magician. As Houdini said, "It's not the trick. It's the magician."
I used to think this a lot, but if you actually read “Designing Miracles” Ortiz, sometimes an effect is just not good period. The performer can make a beautiful presentation of the trick but if it fails to “Cover your tracks” or use the other techniques talked about during the session it probably isn’t the best of tricks, and never will be strait out of the box.

So many magicians today are more worried about every little detail. I want you to go against every rule.
How so? Expand a little please.


How? By being yourself.

What in the world does that mean?


All in all thought provoking essay, but like you said I hope you persuaded me in the direction you wanted.


FYI

All Italics is Sarcasm.

Silver
 
Sep 1, 2007
3,786
15
I say the magician is a spectator! Let me explain, when we are performing for participants not only should we be trying to entertain our audience; we as the performers are the spectators of the participants reactions. Also, if magicians are trying to fool their own kind, doesn’t that make magicians spectators anyway?

I think you already know my thoughts on performing for other magicians. But besides that, such an argument seems a little convoluted.
 
Jul 13, 2009
1,372
0
35
Yes now that I let the words sit a while it does seem I have made a thought pretzel.

"The magician is not the spectator. In learning the secrets, you give up that privilege and instead become the creator, which alone has its merits. But magicians today have resorted to fool spectators and, more importantly, magicians." Enigma

"I say the magician are spectators! We are spectators/observers to our participants reactions to our actions." But what I didn't get completely and should of asked for clarification from the start is this,
"In learning the secrets, you give up that privilege and instead become the creator

What does that mean?


Edit:

Well I know I will not get my answers since he just made the very cliche I am leaving thread, shame it could of been an actual enlightening conversation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jul 13, 2009
1,372
0
35
Edit 2:

False alarm he isn't leaving but some follow up would be nice from the op, or will it die like all the others before it?
 
Searching...
{[{ searchResultsCount }]} Results