Search results

i think if your magic is truly entertaining, what prop you use will have less importance

just a for fun topic, how many of you guys use brian's teachnique. i for one love it and use it quite often, and even recovered from fumbles with it. i also like doing rear thumb palm to breast pocket. and iv been experimenting with a shirting technique from COinMagic with a vanish of...

i made several guardian back/ red back cards this weekend... very cool

interesting view aaron. personally i disagree. im in almost disbief if you think people don;t enjoy the cups and balls. cylinder and coins can be a big hit, and the whole thing just seems immpossiable with a LOT of magic going on 4 coins vanish, reappear in the cylinder under a object...

kolhers routine is my favorate followed by kenners for no gaff needed

great impromptu rise. it was published nearly 10 years ago so revolutionary might not be true. one of the btter out there.... for sure

i would add a few other copper/silver sequences before doing DD, its such a fast small effect you don;t build much suspense or tention

Chris, that would be great. I'm not too big on flourishes but I like this one because it's short yet nice looking.

accully kenners 3 fly is a variation of jonathon townsheds visual coins across. well nto so much a variation then a handing, jons was more misdirection based but it is the routine that started it all

nothings wrong with unusal props. and the deep is great i kinda do a mix between the version in the book and the one on homers dvd

cylinder ans coins

bravo scott thats exactly what i was getting at. i like you more with every post, im glad you are here

this isn;t really a good question. the answer is the one that make the routine flow better, sleeving is a complete vanish, i can get coins caught inside my sleeve and can get them to stay put when the arms drop. if for some strange reason you need to JUST vanish a single coin it can as...

love the kenner material, unfortanatly i got this all in his book( i know many of you guys don;t have it tho) so ill hold out till the fresh stuff gets released

as im not one to let this go easy, im still not convience the handling is different then steve's that appear on his dvd from material form 1985, its been reported to me that he was selling the gaff for the trick as early as 1969. stright from the undergroud... im not so sure. sorry to be a...

thanks for the reply bj, helps loads

im sorry but that was usless, there is not much difference in this gimmick and the oringinal other then a slick surface. i have another one of higher qualilty. its quite evident the gimmick was rush for quantity the way the teflon is cut. i don;t care who manufactures it. its the same

no i own digital dissolve. and what im sayign is this exact routine was released by steve, and id like to hear from the theroy11 team if he is aware they duplicated his effect. the handling of the change and the same gaff all the same. they do credit steve so they are aware of its existance...

i hope one of the big guys can answer this. ok i watched the dvd and all of that and the problem im having is, i can't see, to figure whats different about DD from the steve deusheck routine C/S transpo or marketed version Ultimate copper/silver DD is good, but im disaapointed with the...

95% useful!? impossiable! ... junk... i just went down antoher percent...