Search results

I wouldnt expect many people here to know what Palm d'Or is. What people dont know is that Steerpike is in fact a director.He knows what he's talking about. And besides,he was not attacking saying that he can do it better. You dont need to know how to act to recognize a bad actor. He's...

not much of a review though.. Havent you realized that when close up magic is caught on camera,the method almost always shows? Or it can be worked backward. The effects were added to the movie because thats how our audiences remember the magic.A helluva lot more impossible than it really was.

But at least you HAVE something to do.

Hey,we got the whole crew almost commenting(you and dee.haha) Seriously though,you dont need to study bobo extensively to get into this. Everything is so fluid. I almost love it as much as Freezer burn. Almost

gawd that'd suck to for teenagers to be bored here on a friday night.

BTW the hands dont actually leave the spectators sight during the entire effect. Misdirection is almost not needed.Up until...you know.

How is that stealing your glory? If you know what a good script can be and a few good tricks you should be infinitely taken more serious as a performer than they are. Though,seeking glory is not the way to go about it anyway.

I had the honor of receiving a free copy of Bison months ago from my good friend branden. And yes,im very late on this review. THE DESCRIPTION: The performer borrows a coin from the spectator(s) and displays it at his finger tips cleanly.Applying pressure to the coin,both hands visually bend...

Oh i know that,ive seen you perform. My reference was to the people that take your first statement into a full philosphy or something. As if gimmicks are bad and have no use.

Thats the thing though. Why on gods green earth would you seperate the two? Besides,with cards,I dont think anyone could honestly hold an audiences attention for an hour and a half.Save ricky jay and he various types of magic in a show. Maybe Bill malone but that raises another question...

As a magician I sometimes like watching card magic that takes technique but since its not about me rather the spectator,AND also me as a spectator I dont care much to see cards simply hopping around. And thats almost ALL you can do with pure sleight of hand. Its look "here but oh wait now its...

Well duh.Thats for everything one makes or does in general. But this one isnt about not liking the idea or not. Its how it looks to the people we perform it for. I actually used my friends and family to critique the effects I do and I did use your idea as a reveal instead and they flat out...

Good luck to you,since you cant stop to think that YOU have the right of way instead of other peoples side on the subject. Acting as if you know everything(like a teenager in other words,so that goes to me as well) you never learn and grow.

I personally think its too much. The original handling has it revealed on the other side and shown. Simply and the illusion was a success. In doing that move,me as a spectator,It looks very fishy.It doesnt make any sense to do that and just looks as if you switched or something went on. Im my...

Exactly,Do only two,maybe 3 small flourishes.Ive begun to notice that the small (EX-Devils pirouette) get the crowd more impressed than endless sybil variants. You want them to say "woah he does great magic,and he's skilled at cards" Not " ah well if he can do all that he can do any card tricks"

Of course you perform dan and dave-ish magic,of course.. What settings do you perform though?

Eh,im pretty chill right now so I thought 'might as well'.

We all become Robert Pattinson? (thats the name right..the guy from twilight.)

Oh I know that,I was thinking of the never-ending bottle of wine effect for this actually,but what they had laid out didnt seem..up for it.

If it doesnt look good to you.Then its not ready. Watch it yourself on the camera and judge yourself.