Angle Zero Question

penguincdude · Apr 28, 2009

I have the Daniel Madison Trilogy and am very confused after watching the preview of the 1-on-1 of Angle Zero. Is the method in TWO different from the 1-on-1?

visualartist · Apr 28, 2009

Yes,very different.
So much simpler.

penguincdude · Apr 28, 2009

Well which do you think is better?

lilstunna · Apr 28, 2009

penguincdude said:
Well which do you think is better?

o dont have any of the angle zeros but im sure that the simpler one would probably be better

OpticalDelusionist · Apr 28, 2009

The one on one is super simple, and there's almost nothing to it.
Don't know about the D+M dvd, so no input there.

Jv · Apr 28, 2009

Angle Zero from the DVD, also available as a 1-on-1, describes Angle Zero in more detail, while the one from TWO is a simple explaination.

visualartist · Apr 29, 2009

OpticalDelusionist said:
The one on one is super simple, and there's almost nothing to it.
Don't know about the D+M dvd, so no input there.

The one in the DVD is the exact same as the 1 on 1.

neco · Apr 29, 2009

angle zero from mystique is the exact same effect at the 10n1's section...
the one in two is the same thing the only difference is that D+M didn't gave any presentation for it... just the idea for the effect... hope that helped..

neco

visualartist · Apr 29, 2009

neco said:
the one in two is the same thing the only difference is that D+M didn't gave any presentation for it... just the idea for the effect...

TWO's angle zero is more complex in method.

We have to use our own presentation,not rely on him to give us a whole script.

praetoritevong · Apr 30, 2009

visualartist said:
We have to use our own presentation,not really on him to give us a whole script.

I'd hope that most people do that by default...