towtox, misdirection is the word you're looking for.
To Slicke - With all due respect, I believe that ignoring all negative comments is irresponsible advice. We go to other people for advice in the hope that they see what we can't. We do this because we are rarely good at criticising ourselves fairly. Negative comments are not necessarily incorrect. They're just negative. This is why teachers mark out exams - as opposed to us marking ourselves. We don't always have the answers. I encourage you to view the thread posted below.
To everyone else - I'm one of the people who was criticising his double lift. For the context of this thread, please view either of the two videos in the two active battle threads at the moment (they're the same one), and see if you disagree with me.
The video is on this page:
http://forums.theory11.com/showthread.php?29663-Royal-Road-Effect/page2
My detailed criticism is on this page:
http://forums.theory11.com/showthread.php?29663-Royal-Road-Effect/page3
To towtox again, I'm sorry if the criticism upset you. It was intended to be constructive. I've just finished posting a more lengthy review of what you did wrong. I included ways in which you could improve. I also pointed out some things that you did right.
That said, I'm honest about my criticism. I try to criticise the trick, and not the magician, and I try not to unnecessarily use emotive language. Sometimes this comes across as harsh, sometimes it doesn't. "Your double lift need work" sounds bad - but it's a reflection on your double lift, and not on you. To be honest, everyone will get some pretty harsh criticism at some point. I've gotten some before. I felt terrible. But they were also right, and I improved.
With all due respect, never have I said that your double lift sucks. In fact, I tried very hard to use words like "needs improvement" rather than "horrible" "terrible" or "shocking". I don't know if I cut out those words entirely, but I made a point of not saying that. Word choice is the difference between constructive criticism and abuse.
I have also addressed in my criticism the issue of using a camera vs. real life performances. Yes, real life performances give you the benefit of misdirection. But I don't think it applies in this case, because your mistakes weren't tiny errors you needed a freeze frame to spot. They were glaring ones, when all the focus was on the deck, and you weren't trying to misdirect anyone.