Levitation - Real or Not?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cedric wasn't asking for exposure in my opinion...

While everyone brought up valid points and, hell, even made valid arguments-- I kind of feel Cedric was unjustly attacked by the majority of people in this thread. The root of his original post was asking for a resource to a specific levitation. That's all. Assuming the levitation in question ISN'T original to the cheesy YouTube magician featured in the link of the original post, Cedric was not in the wrong or being disrespectful in any way by asking where he could learn it. In my opinion, the "video magician" would be the unethical one by taking credit for work that isn't his. For some reason, I think a lot of people missed that angle. Yes, Cedric was immature in his initial responses, but people seemed to immediately flame him just for asking an honest question. I don't believe that's what these forums were intended for.

For the sake of completion, the levitation looks very similar to THE ICARUS EFFECT. I personally own ICARUS and can vouch for its legitimacy. Many parts of the video in the original post lead me to believe it's the basic method he's using with some added tweaks for the best appearance on camera. ICARUS is the ingenious invention of Aaron Paterson. It's very similar in concept to the Criss Angel levitation on the market which was created by Jacob Spinney.

So with that, I hope I constructively answered the original post while also bringing to light an issue that... a lot of people here should probably get out more and calm down. No need to be so uptight.

RS.
 
i have no clue what that levetation is. but i doubt that he can really levetate. if he could, he wouldnt look like some cheezy criss angel rip off and have a video of him doing it in his backyard on youtube. he would be doing it for some corporate moguls and getting researched on by scientists.

i wouldnt worry about the levetation he does, and come up with your own that would be better.
just take some time and think about how you would do this.
im sure you can find a way.
good luck
 
Jul 13, 2009
1,372
0
33
I know that. I won't take this as an insult. Because I would like to think it's not. Well hopefully, it's not. Moving on.
No not an insult just one of my quirks. Most things I say are in jest.


Okay I get what you mean now. That being said, I do hope you too will understand that I just want to point Cedric towards a right direction to get levitation methods, instead of asking around in forums.

I fully understand to an extent. Recently, a thread has popped up with the topic matter of: How to make a swami gimmick. Is that thread any different then the one going on right now? The only difference with the other thread is that the OP phrased his/her question differently then the OP here. Forums are the second best places to ask questions, particularly ones about where to obtain a certain effect, or where to find certain information. I understand you don't really see it the same way, which is okay, just understand that it will happen no matter what any of us say.



Understood. At least on a major scale. Nonetheless I think that mentoring and consultation involves a certain level of authorization. That is, they are experts on the field and are suitable to teach. Chatting however, is extremely casual, and sometimes could lead to over-exposure, if you get what I mean.

See the problem with this is that, your over exposure is not over exposure for someone else. You can't really regulate communication like that. Let me use an example of how information through chats is passed down. I know some people here like the video chat rooms and what not. I am going to be completely real with y'll I have discussed methodology with people before mostly because the person I was chatting with was a friend and they wanted to know if product A and B was going to be right for his performing situation. He bought one product and dumped the other.

My question is, was I in the wrong? Was I not just doing what most brick and mortar magic sellers do?


With that in mind, I would like to point out that not all of us in these forums are experts in the field of levitation. I will not deny that there will be some, but can I say it is a minority? (Please correct me if I am mistaken, this is but an assumption.) Meanwhile, it will not be right to be asking in the forums. Instead, finding a mentor would definitely solve the situation, just as you have highlighted. Or, he could buy a DVD.

True a mentor is favored, but some people DO NOT have access to others who can mentor them. What do those magicians do? If the internet was not around, they'd probably just stagnate and move onto another hobby, possibly one that is popular in the local area.

You do not need to be an expert in levitation or anything really to mentor and consult people through the internet. Everyone has some form of knowledge about something and can state their opinion on something if they want to.

I am not a performing magician (currently) But instead I read countless free internet sources on itricks, listen to podcast, and take in as much knowledge I possibly can. I also consider myself incredibly well rounded for a magician, if I really wanted to and I had the money, I could work any and I mean any venue I wanted, (Stage parlor, closeup, illusions, bizarre, mentalism, private readings, the list goes on). Yet I do not consider myself an expert on any of the subjects, does that mean I can't lend a helping hand to someone who has reached out for advice and instead direct them to a mentor?




Honestly, this cannot be argued. At least not for myself. I will not say the same thing for others. Nonetheless, I still stand firm and say this. Magic holds secrets and there will be some which are uncovered to certain people. Take Cedric for example, he hasn't figured out how the youtube fellow does his levitation. However, I will not barge into how he tries to get his hands on this secret. Unless he does something wrong. I feel that asking around in the forums shouldn't be right. You can teach Cedric if you'd like, now I'd have no objections since you've talked about the internet. But note this, there are DVDs made on magic for a reason, to teach. I once again would like to advise Cedric to look into getting these DVDs, instead of asking for the methods on forums. If he has the DVD already, and is having problems, asking for help shouldn't be unethical in any way.

You got some points, but they are jaded and frayed at the edges. Magic does hold secrets, there are many things that are still very much so underground in the truest form of the word. However, magic as a whole does not hold any secrets that can't be found out. With that said I refer back to the analogy that magic is like a closed door, which as an aside I think I got that from The Magicnewswire from either the president of the Magic Circle citation is needed (What is this wikipedia? :p), now even though the door is closed anyone if they so desire can have access to our secrets and normally are greeted with open arms. It isn't that we are discussing method, more like Theory, since as you have stated already, we do not know the exact method since the performer is being tight lipped about it.



Bearing my points above in mind, you may go ahead and hint that to Cedric. But if he comes back to you to ask for the full method? That's wrong. I do hope you understand.

How about you really explain everything fully onto how and why you think that is wrong? I have a huge thorn in my foot with this statement and do not want to latch on it without knowing everything fully.

Should anyone see otherwise, I just want to make a point, a point I have reiterated over and over again. Cedric should just go and get the method through legit means such as findign a mentor or buying a DVD. Not come to these forums and start asking for the method from magicians who may or may not be experts in the field of levitation.

The fact that you keep including DVDs in your post disturbs me. I would take a book over anything now a day then a DVD. Another note, you are debating circles.

I have a question for you and it may seem like something completely out of the blue. How long have you been in magic, more specifically studying the art of magic?


*jams out to some Swallow the Sun, while reading*
 
Jul 13, 2009
1,372
0
33
I wonder how David Blaine levitates.He makes levitating look so real and he made me rethink about my theories on levitation...

He climbed the mountains of india and learned how to yogi fly. But seriously only David Blaine can do this rare form of levitation because, he is actually 300 years old and has plenty of time practicing.


Edit:

Now I now what I got them mixed up with. I was thinking about Yu-gey-ho I mean Yugioh >.>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sep 3, 2007
1,231
0
Guys not only Am I working towards the perfect levitation. But a more ongoing struggle for me is recreating a anytime anywhere version of the Indian Rope Trick, but without the boy getting cut into shreds...haha...


Yeah, from the OP I didn't think you were asking for exposure. The thing is, that is a pretty easy levitation (the video) given the surroundings and video angles. There's potential to use it for the Indian Rope Trick.
 
Dec 18, 2007
1,610
14
64
Northampton, MA - USA
Has anyone seen RayWilliamJohnson videos on youtube? If you had then you will understand this reference:



FAKE AND GAY!

Several reasons:

1.- Why are his legs so stiff?

2.- Why aren't they showing WHATS BEHIND OF HIM?

3.- All the videos start just when he starts "levitating" and when he "descends"

4.- If it is magical powers granted by thor wich can be applyed anywhere, why don't I see live performances? hell if I could this for real I would do it and record myself at the mall all day long.

5.-"According to this guy banachek and some others have offered him money" WTF? is there anyway to contact banachek and have a straight answer? obviously not, I could say that Lady Gaga wants to use some of my written songs and nobody would be able to verify it.

6.- Is a stated fact that you cannot levitate using black. Is a fashion crime (only point where I'm joking)

Now there is your FAKE section of the day, why is the video GAY?

I don't know you, but I don't like videos where half the video are fake levitations and the other half are vanity pictures from a guy that wants to look like boy george.

as I said.

FAKE AND GAY.

Peace out homie.

THIS IS A PC SLAM :mad:

Are you aware of the fact that calling something "Gay" is akin to referring to a black person using the "N" term? It is an ugly slander when used in this manner and something tells me that I'm not the only Gay person on this forum (the magic & entertainment industry is filled with gay people). So you might want to GROW UP a bit and consider your language choices.

As to your arguments, they too prove that you have a limited IQ factor; of course it's a trick and a poor one at that... at least poorly sold when it comes to filming it and making it look like something "impressive"... I did like the cat and dog moving around behind them, that was a nice touch, but not something planned I'd bet.

The fact that no side angle is shown nor anything overhead (more than a few inches over his head) it's obvious that something ain't kosher and the effect has some design flaws... but then the whole presentation makes me think that the original poster was just out to do some self-promotion
 
May 10, 2010
138
0
I'm not in any way eager to carry on this debate any longer, so let's just take a look at what we have now Keo. And perhaps we could actually settle this in, hopefully, a peaceful way.

See the problem with this is that, your over exposure is not over exposure for someone else.

Yea, I agree. However I do believe I am free to look into my own perspectives when I look at the words "over exposure". If you don't think this is over-exposure then I'll pretty much only have two words. Suit yourself. It is our own perspectives anyway.

Yet I do not consider myself an expert on any of the subjects, does that mean I can't lend a helping hand to someone who has reached out for advice and instead direct them to a mentor?

No that does not mean you can't. I am merely suggesting that someone direct him to an expert in the field. Of course, you could lend a hand. But then of course, this could, and in my opinion, should be done in private.

However, magic as a whole does not hold any secrets that can't be found out.

That's true. What I was referring to would be having Cedric take his own step out to unlock that particular door to the secrets he wants to discover.

How about you really explain everything fully onto how and why you think that is wrong? I have a huge thorn in my foot with this statement and do not want to latch on it without knowing everything fully.

Perhaps the word "wrong" was never a good choice to begin with. But nonetheless, I was implying that Cedric should turn to a proper way, say buying the trick, to find out the full method for magic, rather than depend on others for it.

The fact that you keep including DVDs in your post disturbs me. I would take a book over anything now a day then a DVD. Another note, you are debating circles.

I have nothing against buying books. The only reason why I did not include this into my examples and suggestions for Cedric would be the fact that I'm merely shortening my post. Honestly I have never said anything against people who prefer books over DVDs, so why get disturbed? It was merely an example I decided to include.

And if you feel like I'm debating circles, then why not ignore my posts altogether.

I have a question for you and it may seem like something completely out of the blue. How long have you been in magic, more specifically studying the art of magic?

Look mate, this is probably the most insulting question that you have posed me. Either you're mocking my level of magic, you just can't stant how "immature" I am in my arguments, or you're mocking my level of intelligence. Well, I don't know.

Honestly I will admit I am not what you would call an expert in the art of magic, nor will I claim that I am better than you are. Why? Because I am merely one year in and I am pretty much what you would call a newbie. That is, in your perspective that you are much more experienced than I am. Nonetheless, I still stand with my perspective. Though I will acknolwedge your point of view that Cedric was not 100% looking for exposure, I still believe we could direct him to certain other sources nonetheless.

Anyways guys, since no one read my earlier post, I'll say it again.


everyone RELAX.

Got it I am absolutely 100% relaxed mate :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JD

Jul 5, 2009
638
1
Longview, Texas
CT- no i'm not asking for exposure, just where it can be bought...or found.

Not asking for exposure. End of story. Now quit the slamming and bickering.
 
Jul 13, 2009
1,372
0
33
THIS IS A PC SLAM :mad:

Are you aware of the fact that calling something "Gay" is akin to referring to a black person using the "N" term? It is an ugly slander when used in this manner and something tells me that I'm not the only Gay person on this forum (the magic & entertainment industry is filled with gay people). So you might want to GROW UP a bit and consider your language choices.

Maybe you need to get the stick out of your arse, I'd rather use the term gay, (Which in case you haven't noticed is as offensive as the word horse) then the term Faggot which is the real derogatory term. Chillaxe bra, you obviously missed the internet reference any way. I personally found it very funny as a homosexual male.

As to your arguments, they too prove that you have a limited IQ factor; of course it's a trick and a poor one at that...

Clap clap I love irony. You just spent my precious time ranting about how justice used the word Gay as a slam to homosexuals, yet you come out kicking with this line slamming him. You Fing hipo!

I'm not in any way eager to carry on this debate any longer, so let's just take a look at what we have now Keo. And perhaps we could actually settle this in, hopefully, a peaceful way.

Personally, I thought this debate ended three weeks ago. But Okay, I will bite.

"See the problem with this is that, your over exposure is not over exposure for someone else."

Yea, I agree. However I do believe I am free to look into my own perspectives when I look at the words "over exposure". If you don't think this is over-exposure then I'll pretty much only have two words. Suit yourself. It is our own perspectives anyway.

X3, well suit yourself as well. Just hope you don't go to a brick and mortar shop or hey a magic club, those guys will tell you magic principles right quick. Look there is a difference between exposure and the sharing of magical PRINCIPALS. Personally though I really think, like the science community, some ideas should be shared or made aware of to the masses. How are we ever going to advanced if Joe schmo below me continues to reinvent something that I had already invented two years previously? It's like having every person reinvent the wheel. It is unneeded and is counter productive to the community as a whole.

That is one reason why I do not like all these variations, Tivos, etc etc etc coming out. What in the world does it accomplish?? The answer is nothing. Also, just reiterating I am talking about exposure through casual chat, forums, IMs etc etc. and not piracy via torrenting, rapidshare, megaupload, etc etc, that is the truly destructive behavior and is just bad form.


"Yet I do not consider myself an expert on any of the subjects, does that mean I can't lend a helping hand to someone who has reached out for advice and instead direct them to a mentor?"

No that does not mean you can't. I am merely suggesting that someone direct him to an expert in the field. Of course, you could lend a hand. But then of course, this could, and in my opinion, should be done in private.

:rolleyes: anyway if you want me to direct someone to a mentor on levitation. Email Jim Steinmeyer and hirer him as a consultant. Are you happy now Nova? I am not doing anything wrong by telling him how things are done over the forum. It is no worse then saying or talking about one of the thousand ways of doing a flipping double lift.

"However, magic as a whole does not hold any secrets that can't be found out."

That's true. What I was referring to would be having Cedric take his own step out to unlock that particular door to the secrets he wants to discover.

First of all, in magic there are no locked doors just closed doors that anyone, magician or none magician can turn the knob and find out secrets. I gave him references and things to look into. It is only a minor crack in the open door way, a taste of what is hidden behind door number one. If he wants to he can open the door fully, I will not do it for him.

Another thing, I find the entire exposure debate rather pointless. If there is a will there is a way. If there is a true will in someone to go look for magic secrets, then I feel, that person actually has an interest in magic and should be embraced and taken underwing to teach them the ethical practices of magicians. If these people are looking up magic just to know how things are done, then so what! They aren't going to do anything with it, or just go and jack off with it for a few friends then forget about it like discarded porn.


"How about you really explain everything fully onto how and why you think that is wrong? I have a huge thorn in my foot with this statement and do not want to latch on it without knowing everything fully."

Perhaps the word "wrong" was never a good choice to begin with. But nonetheless, I was implying that Cedric should turn to a proper way, say buying the trick, to find out the full method for magic, rather than depend on others for it.

Okay so you are saying instead of being a creator, he should rely on other creators to do the work for him then market it to him so he can buy it as a consumer. I prefer not to be a consumer but a creator. If you prefer to be a consumer, then go for it, nothing wrong with it. Also you evaded my request, why do you not type out your entire stance on why you think me sharing bits of information on an online forum is wrong?

"The fact that you keep including DVDs in your post disturbs me. I would take a book over anything now a day then a DVD. Another note, you are debating circles."

I have nothing against buying books. The only reason why I did not include this into my examples and suggestions for Cedric would be the fact that I'm merely shortening my post. Honestly I have never said anything against people who prefer books over DVDs, so why get disturbed? It was merely an example I decided to include.

And if you feel like I'm debating circles, then why not ignore my posts altogether.

Because unfortunately I feel you are giving miss informed posts and I do not want others to read your posts that I ignored and consider as total truth when in fact it isn't. Neither of our opinions are total truths.

The only reason why I said that about books is for the simple reason that you sound like a magician who is just starting out and the most common mistake I have seen in magicians just starting out is that they rely on DVDS instead of the written word.


"I have a question for you and it may seem like something completely out of the blue. How long have you been in magic, more specifically studying the art of magic?"

Look mate, this is probably the most insulting question that you have posed me. Either you're mocking my level of magic, you just can't stant how "immature" I am in my arguments, or you're mocking my level of intelligence. Well, I don't know.

Not at all, Like I stated previously I had a feeling you haven't been in magic very long. It wasn't meant as insult but merely confirmation of my hunch.

Honestly I will admit I am not what you would call an expert in the art of magic, nor will I claim that I am better than you are. Why? Because I am merely one year in and I am pretty much what you would call a newbie. That is, in your perspective that you are much more experienced than I am. Nonetheless, I still stand with my perspective. Though I will acknolwedge your point of view that Cedric was not 100% looking for exposure, I still believe we could direct him to certain other sources nonetheless.

I don't like it when beginners in magic call themselves noobs or other derivative of it. Just a personal quirk is all, I do not like elitism and if you feel that is what is going on here, I apologize. You will however see that your current perspective will change later on down the path of magic. I know my views on magic seven years back are a complete 180 to what they are now.


Cheers
 
May 10, 2010
138
0
Personally, I thought this debate ended three weeks ago.

I would have liked that to happen, but truthfully i didn't actually notice your post.

Nonetheless, I believe this post will put an end to this debate. How? I will simply avoid arguing against what you have seen as your perspectives by saying that this is wrong, nor will I carry on arguing that my point of view is correct, because in others' eyes, it may not be. You may say I am now one who has nothing more on my part to debate about, hence I've lost, but I do not think of myself this way. I simply have come to a point where I want to accept others' points of views, though holding mine intact at the same time for comparison purposes.

You will however see that your current perspective will change later on down the path of magic. I know my views on magic seven years back are a complete 180 to what they are now.

With regards to this comment, I of course, respect you for your experience in magic. I do not see this as elitism, because I myself, like you, would not like to see this present in our society. Nonetheless, until the point where my views on magic are a complete 180 rotation, I still hold to my perspectives, and will definitely respect yours.
 
Dec 18, 2007
1,610
14
64
Northampton, MA - USA
KeoSilver... my launching into over your immaturity has nothing in common to my getting onto you over how you use the term GAY... check into what is listed as a "hate term" in conjunction to that word being used the way you employed it... hell, there are TV commercials addressing this issue, so maybe you could actually learn how to use the English language a bit more responsibly... maybe even expand your vocabulary so you don't have to resort to such low terms?

Yes, I think you're quite immature; the too and fro argument here between you and others seems to support a hint of self-righteousness... especially if you think I have "wasted" your time... look at how much time and space you've wasted trying to defend things.

I did notice that you didn't disagree with me in my assessment of the "effect" (if you can call it that :rolleyes:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Searching...
{[{ searchResultsCount }]} Results